Jeffro

Joined

• started 46 topics
• posted 6,784 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Jeffro

• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  I make this comment "If we consider the calendar as we understand it today, the argument that a year could start in May, 43 days after the equinox seems unreasonable. Once you understand that it has been retro-fitted in an attempt to tie multiple dating systems together, and that the 2nd May is more like the 25th April in todays terms, it sounds more reasonable".
  Ancient and modern calendrical systems are problematic especially more so when it comes to the purpose of Chronology for there are too many assumptions that must be made so there is no room for dogmatism.

  😂😂🤣😂😂🤣😂😂

  The fact that you don’t understand the dating systems isn’t my problem.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️

  607 for Beginners
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  The precise beginning of the Great War is disputed for some historians would date the event a little later but certainly by October or the Fall of that year,1914 the Great War had started which nicely coincided with the ousting of Satan to the earth with great rage.

  Bald faced lies! WWI started in July 1914, with some significant declarations in August. No historians say it started in October, and there is no basis for imaginary claims about Satan being ‘thrown out of heaven’ (an interpretation made up by Rutherford several years after Russell’s death, replacing Russell’s belief that the ‘dragon’ represented pagan rulers defeated by papal Rome).
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’ continues with the same vague nutbag interpretations that he’s done for years. Everything he says has been thoroughly debunked. Most amusing, his position requires a solstice on a date that is physically impossible. It’s just pathetic.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Already trounced you at every turn before.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  Current and past scholarship has validated 1914 CE

  🤣😂🤣🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂🤣😂😂
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Rattigan350:

  If prophesies called for Jesus to be king, and he hadn't yet, then that was yet for the future of his time.

  No, they were just wrong. Just like you.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Rattigan350:

  There are many prophecies stating that Jesus will become king. But he didn't. He lived and died and did not become king.

  At least you got that part right.
• 
  14

  Are You Ready for the Most Important Day of the Year?

  by RULES & REGULATIONS in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  luke 22:14 so when the hour came, he reclined at the table along with the apostles.

  and he said to them: “i have greatly desired to eat this passover with you before i suffer; 16 for i tell you, i will not eat it again until it is fulfilled in the kingdom of god.” 17 and accepting a cup, he gave thanks and said: “take this and pass it from one to the other among yourselves, 18 for i tell you, from now on, i will not drink again from the product of the vine until the kingdom of god comes.”.

  19 also, he took a loaf, gave thanks, broke it, and gave it to them, saying: “this means my body, which is to be given in your behalf.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  I'm looking forward to when they say Nisan 14 will fall in mid-May like they insist happened in 588 BCE. 🤣🤷‍♂️
  
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Saying Jesus 'sits on his throne' at some future time is (intentionally) vague language. It isn't necessarily synonymous with 'being made king', and they can play games with Jesus 'sitting' and 'standing' at various times. But even if they completely move Jesus' supposed 'enthronement' away from 1914, that year is still crucial for their erroneous 'end of the 7 times', the 'start of Jesus' 'presence'', the 'start of the last days', and their claim of being 'selected in 1919'. So while it might sound significant, it's a bit of a non-event really. And their end-times doctrines still remain inconsistent with the supposed order of events laid out in the Bible anyway.