i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
‘scholar’:
why not provide a single line of evidence that disproves 607 BCE?
You keep rattling off that nonsense, but 607 has been thoroughly debunked from every angle. You aren’t making any sense. It’s like you’re objecting to the fact that there’s not just exactly one problem with it. 🤷♂️
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
🤦♂️ It’s like he’s never actually read the Bible.
Notice how the apologist avoids quoting the relevant scriptures.
607 for Beginners includes full quotes of supporting scriptures.
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
🤦♂️
Back in reality there isn’t a single scripture that even mentions 70 years of exile.
The Bible says 70 years was a period of all the nations serving Babylon, that nations could avoid exile by serving Babylon willingly, that Babylon was called to account when 70 years ended, that 70 years ended when Persia began to reign, and that attention was given to the Jews’ return after the 70 years ended.
But JWs don’t really care what the Bible actually says.
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
🤦♂️
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
🤦♂️ I have not asserted any unique or novel claim about the correct date of the solstice.
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
‘scholar’:
You do not understand the dating systems either
That is a lie you need to tell yourself but I actually understand the dating system very well.
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
No, doofus. Just because you don’t understand the dating systems, that doesn’t mean I don’t. Which is irrelevant anyway.
It is physically impossible for a solstice to have occurred on 9 July on the Julian calendar in the neo-Babylonian period.
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
‘scholar’:
Are you trying to rewrite history?
Says the deluded member of a minor denomination that asserts a rewrite of Neo-Babylonian history with no support from any historian.
🤣🤣😂🤣🤣😂😂
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
The dates for the solstice are known and aren’t calculated by me. Your ad hominem is an irrelevant distraction.
i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .
is this regarding 1914?
or micheal the arch angel?.
‘scholar’:
You are like the virgin on her wedding night who fails to deliver!
Random irrelevant misogyny… interesting pathology you have there.
The Bible most emphatically describes the Jewish/Babylonian Exile of 70 years
Entirely wrong. The Bible explicitly says willingly serving Babylon was the way to avoid exile.
Just go away with your delusions.
