Jeffro

Joined

• started 46 topics
• posted 6,784 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by Jeffro

• 
  35

  Have I Drifted Too Far?

  by sinboi in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  i was shocked, really shocked.

  what i am doing now is so acceptable to the friends around me.. my friends are all doing it.

  it is so normal in the society,.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  I think he’s drifted from his timeline. Apparently he was 17 6 years ago, but now has only recently completed his 2 years in the army which was required at 18.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  Already provided link to information that more than adequately shows 607 nonsense to be wrong.

  No obfuscation, no special pleading.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  why not provide a single line of evidence that disproves 607 BCE?

  You keep rattling off that nonsense, but 607 has been thoroughly debunked from every angle. You aren’t making any sense. It’s like you’re objecting to the fact that there’s not just exactly one problem with it. 🤷‍♂️
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️ It’s like he’s never actually read the Bible.

  Notice how the apologist avoids quoting the relevant scriptures.

  607 for Beginners includes full quotes of supporting scriptures.
  
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️

  Back in reality there isn’t a single scripture that even mentions 70 years of exile.

  The Bible says 70 years was a period of all the nations serving Babylon, that nations could avoid exile by serving Babylon willingly, that Babylon was called to account when 70 years ended, that 70 years ended when Persia began to reign, and that attention was given to the Jews’ return after the 70 years ended.

  But JWs don’t really care what the Bible actually says.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  🤦‍♂️ I have not asserted any unique or novel claim about the correct date of the solstice.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  ‘scholar’:

  You do not understand the dating systems either

  That is a lie you need to tell yourself but I actually understand the dating system very well.
• 
  129

  Is there “new light” on 1914?

  by wallsofjericho in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  i’m hearing paraphrasing like “we just don’t know” .

  is this regarding 1914?

  or micheal the arch angel?.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  Jeffro

  No, doofus. Just because you don’t understand the dating systems, that doesn’t mean I don’t. Which is irrelevant anyway.

  It is physically impossible for a solstice to have occurred on 9 July on the Julian calendar in the neo-Babylonian period.