jwposter (quoting Mathieu Ossendrijver):
The directions “behind” and “in front of”
are defined in relation to the daily rotation of the sky which proceeds from
east to west for an observer in the northern hemisphere, i.e. “behind” is “to
the east of”, and “in front of” is “to the west of”.
Oh dear. Ossendrijver would be mortified by your hackneyed interpretation of his statement. You've completely ignored the rotation aspect and latched on to west as a cardinal direction, which isn't what Ossendrijver is saying at all. As viewed in the northern hemisphere, rotation to the west of astronomical bodies is rotation further to the right. It is quite obvious that Ossendrijver isn't saying the sky rotates towards the west as the cardinal direction on earth, otherwise it would just stop when it got there, and we'd all be dead due to the halted rotation of the earth.
Fish of the Zodiac
The "fish of the zodiac" is a 1915 translation to indicate that the intended constellation is Pisces. Piscis Austrinus isn't a sign of the zodiac.
"Pisces Austrinus originated with the Babylonian constellation simply known as the Fish (MUL.KU)"
MUL.KU is not referenced in VAT 4956. On the same page as the first quote above, Ossendrijver says of SIM in Line 2 of VAT 4956:
“Swallow”, sinünütu(SIM): a part of Pisces.
Now that that's taken care of... Praesepe...?