KalebOutWest:
Why are you like this, thinking I was writing something negative about you? I didn't even have you in mind in those words as they were directed at jwposter.
In that case I apologise. But you said that JWs abandoning 1914 makes arguing about VAT 4956 a waste of time. jwposter (whose position is that Nebuchadnezzar’s 37th year was 512BCE) isn’t arguing for 1914 at all, so it didn’t seem you were only addressing jwposter, whose separate view is not at all affected by a change to JWs’ 1914 doctrine. It therefore seemed you were ridiculing any discussion about VAT 4956.
I thought you did a wonderful job.
But you couldn’t just say that in the same post as saying arguing about VAT 4956 is a waste of time?