Thanks all for your comments...
I wish I had been as critically minded during the Clinton administration. I was a loyal JW back then...not thinking much about politics. But during the elections, I was starting to think for myself. I liked either Gore or McCain. I really thought those should have been the two opponents for the presidency. I don't know where the heck Bush came from.
What are his credentials, really? Gore and McCain have both been senators. Both have worked hard and stood up for what they felt was right. (And of course, they aren't always right) Bush was a governor of Texas. That's quite unlike working on Capitol Hill. I have yet to see an example of Bush deciding against the path of least resistance, especially when campaign dollars are involved. Yes, he talks incessantly about values and responsibity...So we have elected a fine talker (although perhaps not that great with grammar)...
Now about this war...Preston, you explained yourself quite well, thanks...
It will accomplish much less than the problems it will solve. The White House administration is really not focusing on the real question: how do we ensure the safety of our citizens? Do they want us to feel safer, or to actually be safer? There is a not-so-subtle difference.
Great nations have been undone by the fighting of pointless wars. If the primary motivation is the preservation of the ego, that is a problem.
Francois quoted Hitler, a man whose vision we desire not to emulate...Don't you think he was responding to perceived threat when he invaded Poland? The Germans were feeling vulnerable and they welcomed a decisive leader, who would eliminate these threats. The entire history of that regime can be understood in terms of response to perceived threats. In hindsight, we perceive Hitler as a maniac.
cellmould