Chris,
What people want to know is what you think of the article, express your own thoughts and just link to the article in question.
However as some people have suggested the problem is that the genesis account is not reflective of what we know of planetary formation. The genesis account clearly states that the earth is formed first along with the heavens. This does not tally with what we see of planetary formation.
We know that heavier elements are formed inside stars, so all the of the heavy elements that we are surrounded by are the remnants of a long dead star. We also know that the sun was formed before the earth and that there were stars in the sky long before our sun or the earth formed, this directly contradicts genesis 14. Genesis 14 states that the stars and the sun and the moon were created not only after the earth but after god created light!
See the link below for evidence of protoplanetary formation in action, the site is very good for anyone interested in astronomy.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/bad_astronomy/2014/11/06/hl_tau_new_observations_of_a_young_planetary_system.html
(edited as it could have been read that I was suggesting it was my own site that I linked to, it's not, it is the site of a professional astronomer.)