does anyone here take the creation story literally?
if yes, did u do ample research and think carefully but still believe in it?
if u don't think that the story should be taken as literal, what is your reading of it and do u still believe in the bible as the inspired word of god?...thanks in advance..
pomegranate,
Are you saying regeneration(being made alive-born again) comes before faith and repentance. Eph. 2:1-5?
Faith is a gift and man can't choose God Romans 3:10-11 unless enabled right? "No one comes to the son uless it is granted to him by the father"
Are you talking about "effectual calling" as the WCF discribes it.
Are you a CALVINIST?
does anyone here take the creation story literally?
if yes, did u do ample research and think carefully but still believe in it?
if u don't think that the story should be taken as literal, what is your reading of it and do u still believe in the bible as the inspired word of god?...thanks in advance..
aChristian wrote:
I believe the story of Adam and Eve happened quite literally, exactly as Genesis tells us that it did. I believe that "the first Adam" was a real historical person.
does anyone here take the creation story literally?
if yes, did u do ample research and think carefully but still believe in it?
if u don't think that the story should be taken as literal, what is your reading of it and do u still believe in the bible as the inspired word of god?...thanks in advance..
Angie wrote:
Christianity (Because of his research is a christian now).
NO, because of the grace of God revieled in the gospel your husban is a Christian. Romans 1:16,17 the gospel alone, not evidences, is the power of salvation.
jr
Arminianism sucks
does anyone here take the creation story literally?
if yes, did u do ample research and think carefully but still believe in it?
if u don't think that the story should be taken as literal, what is your reading of it and do u still believe in the bible as the inspired word of god?...thanks in advance..
The greater problem with aC is that if he eliminates the biblical doctrine of the first Adam then he has erased the need for the second Adam and thus distroyed the biblical basis of an IMPUTATION of Christ's rightiousness to us. A&E took God's word very litteraly until the serpint challenged God's word as litteral "hath God said?" Gen 3:1,2. Yet A&E stop taking God's word litteraly at that point and adopted a non-litteral herminudic Just like you aC, and sinned in the garden. I believe aC you are Going after a bigger fish when you attact plainary verbal inspiration and the creation account. I think you are trying to deny the doctrine of creation to get at original sin and the imputation of Adam's guilt to us, thus attacking our need for Christ's rightiousness by faith alone imputed to us. That aC is what you are really going after.
kick back have a beer and think about it
late,
jr
if jesus is not god, then explain... .
-how can jesus know all men (john 16:30)?
-how can jesus, the christ, dwell in you (col. 1:27)?
Hey thats Matt Slick I know him He went to Westminster Seminary in Escondido California....
BTW exigete the Prolog to Hebrews, Hebrews 1:1-8 "Who's thrown O God?"
it seems nothing gets the good people in here so upset as lies.
we all seem to be extra sensitive to lies and damned lies because of being victimized by one of the biggest lairs around, the wts.. but have you ever really tested yourself to find out if you are really snow white yourself?
you got the guts to find out?
Hey, GentlyFeral
I have and old friend of yours who lives in San Deigo now I'm trying to convince him to join this board he used to live in Berkeley but now he is a student at Westminster Seminary. I don't know if he has time since his wife is going to have a baby. But you used to fight with him constently on old messege boards like "catch 22" he use to be an elder now he is at Westminster. I thinking of going down there and visiting him. Anyway do you remember
John Wycliff
thought this was funny!.
drinks and personalities.
seven new york city bartenders were asked if they could nail a woman's personality, based on what she drinks.
Single Malt Scotch
McCollough or Laughvlin is my first choice.
Hey, GentlyFeral
I have and old friend of yours who lives in San Deigo I'm trying to convince him to join this board he used to live in Berkeley but now he is a student at Westminster Seminary. I don't know if he has time since his wife is going to have a baby. But you used to fight with him constently on old messege boards like "catch 22" he use to be an elder now he is at Westminster. I thinking of going down there and visiting him. Anyway do you remember
John Wycliff
hey peeps, how are you?.
the name is mark, i've been hanging around here from time to time.
i read about the elders meeting with officer danni.s.
WOW, I haven't seen this much drama on a JW discussion board since the old "catch 22" board was up, if any can remember way back in the day 5 1/2 years ago... When an elder was going to put a contract out on some guy (John Wycliffe) JW for short and the fearce battles with someone named "Exuberent Potato Girrl" if any can remember. Does anyone here go back that far and remember the old "catch 22" board?
http://www.orlandosentinel.com/sports/highschool/lake/orl-lkllemon16011602jan16.story?coll=orl%2dnews%2dprint%2dasec.
coach won't let surgery stop him.
by josh robbins.
Whow......
What a trip...
Both Lou and Chet are J-Dubs?????????
I mean I totally remember the 1984 World Series (It kinda sucks I was rooting for Steve Garvey, Kirk Bevauqua, Tony Gwynn, Gery Templeton, That Guy that lost arm with the Giants and the rest of the Padres)
What other famous people are JWs?
That Tiger team in 84' was a kick but team they could of easily handeled the 86' Mets.
this thread will hopefully serve as the platform for a friendly debate about the issue of how much respect the watchtower society deserves from ex-jehovah's witnesses.
do we blast the hell out of the borg and don't let a kind word in edgewise?
do we acknowledge that they have done some things right and (shudder) even good?
tyydyy,
look, I am sympathetic to you cause for the most point but just want you to make logical valid argument that are true...
Take a logic class and learn what modus ponens and modus tollens and other things in the wonderfull world of logic even though the class may be a bit boring
