Mixed signals? Contrast Finland here:
Where's the much boasted unity? It sure looks like two differing paths.
the jehovah’s witnesses community in the netherlands will not hold an independent inquiry into the sexual abuse of members, despite being urged to do so by justice minister sander dekker.read more at: https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2018/05/jehovahs-witnesses-reject-calls-for-independent-inquiry-into-sexual-abuse/item in dutch news on tv (english subs available)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nkvtll8wjca&feature=youtu.be.
Mixed signals? Contrast Finland here:
Where's the much boasted unity? It sure looks like two differing paths.
it’s quite affirming to see the horrific material that they’re serving up at the convention this year.
aside from blatant homophobia, the scenes at the end of the convention that are discussed on another thread stoop to new levels of fear mongering.
it seems to occur to nobody inside the organisation that this kind of material could trigger fear, deprsssion, anxiety, stress.
One thing about the video hit me. The GB feel that the org is being besieged. In their minds the child abuse legal cases are draining them of money. Inner org leaks are feeding their "classified" documents to Satan's world. Growth in most western lands is stagnant or negative. Opposers are organized like never before in online forums, and they have been coming into meetings in groups and really disrupting them, making videos of it all, and then posting such encounters online. The GB have not encountered these sorts of things much before, do not know what to do, and are looking for divine rescue.
I also noticed the absence of little children in the group "under attack." Teenagers were there, but no little ones. What's up with that?
an eyebrow raiser to be sure.
i can understand the clergyman being so baptist that he'd still use the name jehovah since it was popular in english and german churches for a long time during and after the reformation, but 607?.
see ¶ 6 under the heading "the historicity of the book of daniel".
Thanks, Bobcat, Earnest and dropoffyourkeylee. I found the references in Darby, in his Chronological Table on p. xxviii: "606 ... The 'Times of the Gentiles' commence" and the one in the Scofield Ref. Bible. Scofield has a note on Jer. 25 (p. 798) where he offers three possibilities as to when the 70 years "may be reckoned to begin" but states that the 606 date "is the more probable reckoning."
It seems more likely that this David Oldfield fundamentalist clergyman is following these old 19th century people that Russell. It's interesting that such Fundamentalism is still around, but thank goodness it is not common, but is in Post Falls, Idaho! I guess it wasn't just the WTS that tweaked a year in.
the attached picture is historical.
the man on left is ari hakkarainen, representative of jw in finland.
the woman in middle is reporter susanna päivärinta and the lady at right is josefina pakomaa who was abused by family friend - a jw - when she was 11. a vicious apostate today.
Wow. Thanks for the post. It makes me wonder what is going on here—is this guy stepping out on his own? Is this some half-baked PR move orchestrated by the GB? There is a lot of fudging and dodging of the facts and of history here. Whatever the case, it is noteworthy. We'll have to wait and see what comes next.
i just took a look at one of atlantis' recent links of a letter written from the service dept to a brother about wearing a beard.
i noticed that it was written from walkill, not patterson or warwick.
of course, who can keep up with all the org changes in recent years?
I just took a look at one of Atlantis' recent links of a letter written from the Service Dept to a brother about wearing a beard. I noticed that it was written from Walkill, not Patterson or Warwick. Of course, who can keep up with all the org changes in recent years? It set me wondering just what is where anymore. What is at Patterson? What is at Warwick? What is at Wallkill?
It used to be that Patterson had the Service and Legal Departments as well as the schools. Did that letter come from Walkill because that's now the HQ of the US Branch?
Any help understanding the "divine organizational mysteries/secrets" would be appreciated.
an eyebrow raiser to be sure.
i can understand the clergyman being so baptist that he'd still use the name jehovah since it was popular in english and german churches for a long time during and after the reformation, but 607?.
see ¶ 6 under the heading "the historicity of the book of daniel".
An eyebrow raiser to be sure. I can understand the clergyman being so Baptist that he'd still use the name Jehovah since it was popular in English and German churches for a long time during and after the Reformation, but 607?
See ¶ 6 under the heading "The historicity of the Book of Daniel". It's about half way down the page:
http://www.idahobaptist.com/daniel/dan-043.htm
Maybe he's been reading CT Russell or some source Russell used? He has no interest in the Gentile Times, day-year stuff, or 1914.
tell us a little about yourself and your family.. i was born and raised in southern california, with a brief stint with parents as need-greaters in central america.
my parents accepted a study in the d2d work, i believe my father was interested in the revolutionary aspect of the religion, and my mom said she wanted to learn the bible.
they were baptized in 1937 i think, and attended the one and only los angeles kh at the time.
Thanks for your story. It was insightful.
so, once again the society has produced a cringe-worthy, spew-inducing piece of "cinema".. i don't recognise this religion anymore...... enjoy this review:.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5f0tovqkfem.
Is it possible to see the video without Lloyd Evans' BS and make up our own minds about it?
our dog needed some serius surgery recently & my wife (still in) was very concerned that if he needed a blood transfusion she thought this would constitute a misuse of blood.
i was stunned as never heard of this.. is this a thing?
i left 12 years ago & wondered if it's always been or introduced in the years after my leaving.. any info would be great.. phats.
Thanks, dozy, for the quotation. How utterly Freddie Franzesque:
"in the case of a pet or any other animal under the jurisdiction of a Christian."
how does god dividing humankind and fixing the boundaries of the peoples “according to the number of the sons of israel” make any sense if the nation of israel did not even exist yet?
(genesis 10) "it makes little sense for god, shortly after he dispersed the nations at babel, to have based the number of geographical regions on the earth on the family size of israel, especially since there was no jewish race at the time (genesis 10 table of nations).
this problem is compounded when one considers deuteronomy 32:9. what logical correlation was moses making when he wrote in verse 8 that god "set the bounds of the people according to the number of the children of israel" and then made the concluding observation in verse 9 that "the lord's portion is his people, jacob his allotted inheritance" (niv)?
ILJ,
You're welcome, and I'm .
I meant to say get some non-conservative source on this matter. There are non-conservative Protestant, Catholic and Jewish scholars.