In a publication of this nature, accuracy is going to be a crucial and pivotal matter in the acceptance of the book's material. But simply from the images given here I've seen two instances of carelessness with wording that give wrong impressions.
The comments refer to "these excerpts from the July 1, 1973 Watchtower" and then follow up with, "The April 1, 1972 Watchtower adds..." I realize that it's unintentional and just a poor word choice, but the fact is that a magazine published in 1972 cannot "add" anything to one published in 1973.
Of greater concern to me is the impression given by the following:
"In 1972 the author published... the book received good reviews, with Prof. M. James Penton stating: [quote snipped] (Apocalypse Delayed. 2nd ed. 1997."
This comes across as saying that when the book was published in 1972, Jim Penton gave it a good review. (cough) Seems unlikely, since he was a solid high-ranking Bethelite at the time and didn't leave until the Bethel witch-hunt occurred several years later.
It disturbs me that a book perporting to expose falsehoods has such careless phrasing in the minute parts of it that I have seen. It makes me wonder how carefully the rest is documented.
COMF