in the 4 gospels jesus was alive.so that means they could not be new testament because you cannot have a testament unless the testator is dead.a testament is not in force until after the death .
also no one could have been saved because there was no shed blood yet.
In the 4 Gospels Jesus was alive.SO that means they could not be New Testament because you cannot have a Testament unless the Testator is dead.A testament is not in force until after the death . ALso no one could have been saved because there was no shed blood yet
By that logic they could not be Old Testament either - by that logic the Old Testament could not be called such.
i've stumbled across a most creative artful photography, placing jesus in contemporary scenarios.. http://www.thejourneysproject.com/c-294-fine-christian-art.aspx.
for a mere $1,000 i too, could have jesus working his makeover in my bedroom.
ooh, la la.. i am having strong and mixed reactions to this work, and i welcome your input..
The ones done on authentic black velvet are extremely attractive. I think they cost about $50.00 in the border towns, but that is negotiable.
some of our writers do the above.
is it automatic formatting on your computer or do you do it deliberately?
i am interested in the whys and wherefores of how you write.
Not using two spaces is the sign of a serious mental illness.
How did this thread get turned into a discussion of Obama/Romney?
How did this thread get turned into a discussion of Obama/Romney?
this is pretty much how i feel.......who disagrees with this?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yjo4duhmrzk&noredirect=1.
Science is a method not a body of knowledge.
Actually, it is both - and nothing without both.
Excellent thread, BTW...
knowing is good.. not knowing is bad.. knowing that you don't know leads to inquiry, research and education.
that is good.. assuming you know the validity of your research material is bad.. sometimes you are stumped but you don't know that you are stumped.
you proceed anyway.. .
I was thinking this morning while driving on the freeway that Watchtower theology is a series of filled-in blanks that are guesses for their crossword puzzle
bible themed matrix. This and that seem to fit until the intersection of other KNOWN facts disqualify the guesses.
The Watchtower approach, as it were, is to fill in the blanks with INK in utter confidence with no provision for error until that conclusion is inescapable.
Quite so.
A similar thing could be said for a person who has decided that he is the gay, black, new Christ - and proclaimed it publicly.
Rather strange, but not arguably more strange than a religion claiming to be god's sole representative on earth - and which has NEVER gotten a single one of their prophecies to come true.
this is pretty much how i feel.......who disagrees with this?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yjo4duhmrzk&noredirect=1.
And once again, BTS - the Casto Atheistic Communists proved to have a horrible record over civil rights.
this is pretty much how i feel.......who disagrees with this?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yjo4duhmrzk&noredirect=1.
Not exactly in circles, Talesin. There is a difference in what I would call a "secular" government and what I would call an "atheistic" one.
The difference being that an atheistic government would try to suppress all religions and promote atheism - which in fact the Russian and Chinese communists did.
My point still stands that the only significant and "atheistic" governments have proven to be at great fault on human rights issues.
this is pretty much how i feel.......who disagrees with this?.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=yjo4duhmrzk&noredirect=1.
Perhaps we should ask the question then, BTS - "Does Pat Condell support or deny freedom of religion"?
