crossroads

Joined

• started 25 topics
• posted 476 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by crossroads

• 
  19

  Resurrection... to what TYPE of body?

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  there is a bit of a debate about the resurrection, and to what type of body people will be resurrected to.

  it is quite simple, and encompasses two resurrections: the 'first' resurrection... and the general resurrection.. 1. the 'first' resurrection -.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  First, Aguest Thanks for spending the time to answer
  at least THAT question of mine. I do believe in JESUS
  and that you can have an intimate relationship with
  HIM. But it's just HIM and you. HE will make feel you better
  He will lead you in the right path to take if you are
  so inclined to listen. Yes you can throw all your
  burdens on HIM. All you need is "a bus of load of
  faith to get buy" if you know who penned that line
  I'll be very impressed. FAITH that HE was here HE
  died and HE rose again. Talking about keeping it
  simple stupid I mean can it be any easier.

  But the things you post have no merit.
  Didn't Stephen get Resurected instantly because
  HE never died he fell asleep asking JESUS to
  accept HIS spirit. So once JESUS rose the ressurection
  had begun. In revelation JESUS comes and takes his
  faithful away before the tribulation STARTS
  REV:3--10
  The 144,000 are gathered once he takes these ones away.
  These are the ones that learn the word from the two
  witness's who then arrive on the scene probably
  Mose's and Elijah. Read the transfiguration and
  the rich man and lazarus and of course the only two
  places where 144,000 are mentioned. BTW anionted
  ones do not have to be of the 144,000 because STEPHEN
  and all apostles were anionted yet not off that group.
  One other thing the 144,000 are all JEWISH. Now then
  if you are not jewish and didn't get taken away prior
  by the LORD. This is your last chance for salvation
  and that is to be part of that great crowd which accepts
  the word that the 144,000 accept but are not jewish.

  As far as the spiritual kind of being that I and others will be at that time I do not know, neither may I add do
  you. I just got to keep on keeping on in the FAITH of
  our LORD that he will take me there.

  Anyway that is what is written I do not claim to have
  new scrolls or have any new information DIRECTLY
  given me by something or being from beyond and if
  you think HE talks directly to you. Then really you are
  no better than Smith, Young, White, Russel, Rutherford,
  Franz, White,The Pope, Koresh, Moon, or any of our
  other cult hero's.

  Peace and Love
  Mark
• 
  19

  Resurrection... to what TYPE of body?

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  there is a bit of a debate about the resurrection, and to what type of body people will be resurrected to.

  it is quite simple, and encompasses two resurrections: the 'first' resurrection... and the general resurrection.. 1. the 'first' resurrection -.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  OK---Aguest I'll bite how do you get to this peaceful
  place that gives you all this insight that none of us
  others seem to have? Are you as it were CONNECTED
  as the old liars, scam artist, and murders are in
  BROOKLYN?(or say they are like you are doing)

  Hi Agape actually we are pretty nice just going round
  and round with this guy on various things and it looks
  like he(she) doesn't finish the discussion at hand and
  starts something new when the SPIRIT or new light
  or whatever(not proving his thought) tells him to start
  a fire over there. In much the same vain the JW'S do
  when they read you the 3 scriptures they have been
  taught on a subject and when you rebute their 3 they
  punt and say look over there.

  Peace and Love-Agape-and just the facts please
  Mark
• 
  13

  Crossroads, Farkel, et al. re Tree of Knowing Bad.

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  dear crossroads, may i ask how is that we can conclude that the tree of knowledge was not to be used... or even never to be?

  indeed, adam and eve were told not to eat of it, but what makes you think all beings were?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  Aguest did you do that little exercise I asked you to
  do on the other TREE thread. I don't understand why
  we had to jump over here or why you even started
  another one besides this one. But when all is lost
  I guess it's always best to punt . Well heading for
  the hay now I hope you do the same and get some
  of your glorious visions so we can come closer to
  knowing what this YHWH has in store for us next.
• 
  19

  Resurrection... to what TYPE of body?

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  there is a bit of a debate about the resurrection, and to what type of body people will be resurrected to.

  it is quite simple, and encompasses two resurrections: the 'first' resurrection... and the general resurrection.. 1. the 'first' resurrection -.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  I hate to do this to AGUEST but but that pipe down
  take those head phones off throw the rest of that
  Jack Daniels down the drain. And start drinking
  some black coffee when you sober up please
  come back
• 
  13

  Crossroads, Farkel, et al. re Tree of Knowing Bad.

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  dear crossroads, may i ask how is that we can conclude that the tree of knowledge was not to be used... or even never to be?

  indeed, adam and eve were told not to eat of it, but what makes you think all beings were?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  YEAH and the apostels eat HIS body and DRANK his
  blood too.
  "Nowhere man please LISTEN you don't know what
  your missin' "
• 
  13

  Crossroads, Farkel, et al. re Tree of Knowing Bad.

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  dear crossroads, may i ask how is that we can conclude that the tree of knowledge was not to be used... or even never to be?

  indeed, adam and eve were told not to eat of it, but what makes you think all beings were?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  Oh one more thing WHAT HEIGHT? They were suppose
  to fill the earth and subdue it. They did even with little
  fatherly help. WHAT HEIGHT were they suppose to be gods
  or humans
• 
  13

  Crossroads, Farkel, et al. re Tree of Knowing Bad.

  by AGuest in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  may you all have peace!.

  dear crossroads, may i ask how is that we can conclude that the tree of knowledge was not to be used... or even never to be?

  indeed, adam and eve were told not to eat of it, but what makes you think all beings were?

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  Satan ate of that tree you are really off in no where land.
  Since when do spirit beings eat or do you have new scrolls
  opened to you. As far as the command goes that god of
  yours line is that he does not change whats good today
  is good tomorrow.

  Your line of thinking is as diluted as the being that set
  this game up to begin with.
• 
  103

  The "Tree" of WHAT?

  by Farkel in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the account of adam and eve as a literal event is so full of logical contradictions that it is mind-boggling.

  it only takes a minimum of scrutiny to discover that fact, too.. there is something god did not want adam and eve to know.

  he didnt want them to know the difference between good and evil.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  AGUEST-If you are a slave of CHRIST great. But do an
  exercise for me and but CHRIST qualities and actions
  in one column and the qualities and actions of that
  old testament god YHWY in another now COMPARE.
  Looks like night and day to me or is that
  LIGHT and DARKNESS

  Peace and Love from someone who believes in the LORD
  but really has a hard time thinking love came forth from
  YHWY. Again I ask why are our kids answerable to
  us their parents? Remember apples and apples of
  course parents do things for the good of the rest of the
  family. But their were no other SIBLINGS they were not
  harming the rest of the human race their was no others remember duh . YHWH was harming the unborn by the
  way he set the game up to be played. Oh well if you do the
  exercise you'll see the difference between the two but from what I see you won't SEE the difference.

  Thanks Farkel for the thread
• 
  18

  IMPORTANT MESSAGE for True Believers

  by Fire in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  dear brothers and sisters,.

  in the times of the old testament the prophets foretold of the coming of a saviour,a son of god, a king of kings.

  the pharisees, being imperfect men, interpreted these prophecies to mean that a literal king would be coming to nation of israel.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  Fire--You need a shower or to give me some of what
  you are smoking which must have caused this blaze
  you are in. True Believers in What? If it's the bible then
  you would know his name is not jehovah. Now about
  making NEW bodies as a from of creating. If seperating
  the waters in day two was creating than why is not joining
  them together in Noahs day creating?

  Well if our LORD had his reign for a day in 75 I'm glad
  things are much better know and I was saved through
  the holocust. BTW if HE has given HIS kingdom back
  to HIS father. And the Father always wanted his name
  vindicated could you please clear up the name issue
  and tell me please what the fathers name is.

  There is one way one light one truth and it is all
  spritual for ALL THE TRUE BELIEVERS out there.
• 
  103

  The "Tree" of WHAT?

  by Farkel in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  the account of adam and eve as a literal event is so full of logical contradictions that it is mind-boggling.

  it only takes a minimum of scrutiny to discover that fact, too.. there is something god did not want adam and eve to know.

  he didnt want them to know the difference between good and evil.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  crossroads

  Lovedub--Do you think a judge sentence YHWH to
  take parenting classes? I did not mention a stove
  our guest did. I just used HOT and if a child does not
  know what hot is he has know idea what you are talking
  about. Much like Adam because assuming nothing
  that has not been written, death has never-ever been
  mentioned before. If you believe the account god is then
  responsible for murdering the entire human population
  it's called depraved indifference. I think I could make a
  case I'll get Angie Harmon(law&order) to present it to
  a grand jury(she is so cute). Here it is.

  Howard and Betty but candy all over Phil and Lil's playroom.
  They are still in diapers. In the middle of the room
  they place a big shinny bowl with pioson candy with the most beautiful wrapping paper. Good old Howard now tells them of
  all the candy in the room you may eat just do not eat
  anything out of that very shinny bowl because you'll
  die and he leaves. Phil and Lil look at each other
  and say wah wah wah-no Lil-shaba dabba do.
  They have no clue what their loving father has said.
  Dad comes back , finds this incredible smell coming
  from this room opens the door and sees his precious
  twins have eaten the pioson. Does he call 911 and
  get his beloved children to the hospital no not Howard.
  He is mad he changes their diapers puts new clothes
  on them and kicks his beloved twins to the crub.

  That is murder all. You can have Bobby or anyone else
  from the Practice defend your client. But they aren't
  winning this one-----Sentence Life no parole--Oh but
  judge all of Phil and Lil's offspring are going to die to
  millions upon millions of people. OK--OK--OK
  Get the needle out.