started a history channel series on netflix last night called bible rules.
first episode was interesting.
in one part is was discussing stoning (which was not exclusive to the people of the dessert god).
27 So he took his firstborn son who was going to reign in his place and offered him up as a burnt sacrifice+ on the wall. And there came to be great indignation against Israel, so they withdrew from against him and returned to their land.
I'm counting my time btw... lmao... time, as if.
Mind you they were attacking moab and who/what's wrath/anger came against them??
started a history channel series on netflix last night called bible rules.
first episode was interesting.
in one part is was discussing stoning (which was not exclusive to the people of the dessert god).
2 Kings 3:27
International Standard Version
So he took his firstborn son, whom he intended to reign after him, and offered him up as a burnt offering on the wall. There subsequently came great anger against Israel, so they abandoned the attack and returned to their homeland.
Looks like moloch had some street cred too.
started a history channel series on netflix last night called bible rules.
first episode was interesting.
in one part is was discussing stoning (which was not exclusive to the people of the dessert god).
Yes the stoning they suggested was not to show loyalty towards the persons wrong doing, but to show how you would be loyal if the city was attacked etc, totally power/control/political. So how is disfellowshipping any different? Its not some enlightened spiritual form of justice, its bronze-motha-f&%$ing-age control.
_Morpheus They also mentioned a scripture (i need to find it) where the moabites or someone sacrificed a child and the Israelites lost a battle. Looks like the desert god recognizes the effectiveness of child sacrafice.
started a history channel series on netflix last night called bible rules.
first episode was interesting.
in one part is was discussing stoning (which was not exclusive to the people of the dessert god).
Started a history channel series on Netflix last night called bible rules. First episode was interesting. In one part is was discussing stoning (which was not exclusive to the people of the dessert god).
Something they strongly emphasised was how there were a lot of ways to kill someone. Yes this was barbaric but there was another factor to it as well. It demonstrated your loyalty. Sound like disfellowshipping? Everyone gets to participate this way they can show their loyalty to the religious leaders and group. Vicariously representing some diety.
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news0101/planofsalvation.html.
if you haven't seen this before thought you'd like it.
kate xx.
i have noted that the main problem for those who are seduced by the watchtower society is their ignorance about the bible itself.
people who believe that the bible is the word of god usually ignore the studies on textual criticism and how scientific criteria forbid absurd stories like that of the global flood.
so, i strongly believe that students in schools need at least an obligatory course on "the bible" through the point of view of science and the textual criticism.
I agree with you. That was what woke me up. Weekly bible reading. Then questioning and researching, the realising the witnesses have molded the bible into a witness world. If you were raised in this is what you believe.
This is why I believe Caleb in floroda has some of the best info for crushing witness fantasies about the bible. I am a huge critic of what's in the bible and how dangerous it's ideas cab be. But people don't realise what it was and leave it like that as a cultural artifact of story telling and not the word of THEIR almighty god
i consider myself smart.
go ahead, laugh.
i have a sense of humor too.. but i grew up a jw and also believed in the bible.
just got back from the wt study and it overall was just so blindingly biased and leading.. i had to read it from the platform too, i hope they couldn't see the confounded look on my face as i read this craziness out!.
first we consider the faith of abel, enoch, noah, abraham, isaac and jacob, and moses.. all of these people are held up as sterling examples of blind faith, with the article pointedly saying that their imaginations sustained their faith in gods promises for them.
no mention anywhere at all that all of these characters saw and talked to angels, spoke to god himself, saw and performed miracles, or any of the other feats experienced by these characters.
Crazy guy, I think you are correct.
JWS were always a cult, but its not my grandpas cult anymore. I feel they are going through a shift and its causing them some identity crisis. They are trying to preserve membership while finding their new identity. The message is less dogmatic, and more emotional and topical while the cult tools are still strong.
Where is today's revelation book???
Where is the trinity brochure???
yea they were out there and crazy but the org had balls. Now its stand by this cart with your ipad and fantasize about petty lions.
just got back from the wt study and it overall was just so blindingly biased and leading.. i had to read it from the platform too, i hope they couldn't see the confounded look on my face as i read this craziness out!.
first we consider the faith of abel, enoch, noah, abraham, isaac and jacob, and moses.. all of these people are held up as sterling examples of blind faith, with the article pointedly saying that their imaginations sustained their faith in gods promises for them.
no mention anywhere at all that all of these characters saw and talked to angels, spoke to god himself, saw and performed miracles, or any of the other feats experienced by these characters.
I keep saying it. The writing dept has gone mental. I think maybe the gb is more involved lol. Maybe this is why
in the beginning of internet the society was worried about the information published exposing its falsehood.
so, i wonder how many people lost the society on account of forums and web sites like this.
.
