Mr. Kim,
For whatever reason you think I have my alias, I can assure you that you are wrong. Just like you have been wrong about everything else...
With regards to finding a true expert with a "Dr. of science degree"....again, you have proven yourself to be a laughable ingrate. What science would you care to discuss at any length? Unlike yourself, I wont threaten to charge you any fee to educate you on whatever branch of science you are interested in, including what I would assume to be your favorite brand, Science Fiction!
Also, any statements that I make are open to peer review and scrutiny by other posters on this forum, and I welcome such dialogue.
Now with regards to your statement that aquatic fossils have been found at elevations of 10,000 feet. You are 100% correct, in fact, you can find them higher! That doesnt mean that those mountains were once submerged at their present heights though. Anyone with a basic understanding of planetary geology and plate techtonics knows that mountains are caused by continental shelves and lithospheric plates as they move and push against each other. This causes a folding of the crust on the surface and a pushing up of the rock underneath. Any fossils contained on this land mass, aquatic or not, get pushed up...it really is that simple.
What I want to know from you is, what makes you think that those fossils are 5000 years old?