First of all, I do believe that there are two sides to every story.
Was it tragic that some of the events listed in this article happened? Of course. But to say that is always what happens is too extreme.
How many times have known, confessed criminals gotten away with murder because they "were not read their rights?" It has happened many times. Why is no one complaining about that? I would imagine more people have gotten away with major crimes than have been " tortured" as the article claims.
I have a neighbor that is a criminal defense attorney. According to him, there are MANY cases thrown out on obviously guilty case, because someone did not give him his rights.
A criminal, before he is given his rights, can loudly proclaim that he is guilty, and how he did it, etc, and if he was not given his Miranda rights beforehand, none of what he says can be entered into court. Something wrong with that picture too.
In my opinion, this article, while it may raise concerns, is not a balanced view from which to make an intelligent decision.