good afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
Further on the names. Juan said there were multiple people from the other JW FB pages (I had been calling them sites...prob not the right term), who were adding people from the groups. Hence, the dilemma of not having one name.
But you can't be "added" to our facebook AAWA page - you can only "like" it. Nobody can "like" it for you.
That is a change. I had to cleck "Unlike" as well as "Unfriend" when I removed myself from the page last Sunday.
good afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
Update: Because I "unfriended" and "unliked" the AAWA site, Juan says they cannot tell who added me. Fair enough. He said because I am in other exJW sites, I may have been added by someone from one of those sites. I have asked for the names of the people who were adding from these other sites so I could contact them personally. I don't have a good feeling. I hope my feeling is wrong.
I am so disappointed in all this. But it is what it is...
good afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
There was no "very quick nip" in any bud on this subject. Because of that we are agonizingly still talking about it today.
This is one place I didn't think I would have to worry about things being made right, given our common ground. I'm beyond annoyed.
good afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
Update: The at [email protected] has responded to my email. He asked me to provide him with the names of the xJW groups I am a member of on FB.
good afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
Ah, Cedars, thank you for posting. I will email you.
Edited to add: email sent.
good afternoon jwn... .
i`ve spent the morning and part of my afternoon... getting to the bottom of... why names were added to the awaa fan page... it`s a dangerous thing to happen in our world... faders can be outed,we can lose,family,friends... the results can be an absolute disaster... .
aawa "did not" create the facebook awaa fan page.
@Juan Viejo2: Thank you for your response. I've been super busy all day at work and plan on sending a PM later when I have a chance to catch up on this thread.
As of yet, the powers that be that know who violated the privacy trust and breached a code of ethics have not produced the name of that individual.
This is a familiar feeling. EVERYBODY here knows of an organization that protects the rights of the violator over the rights of the victim or potential victims, don't we? AAWA seems like it has taken the same position; defensive and protective of it's own agenda over the victims of a careless act under its watch. Please prove me wrong.
Hilarious!
i noticed this on slimboy's list of things that can get you df'd, and i checked it against the "flock" book.. .
there is no mention of blood transfusions!
i know they are downplaying this, but have they stopped df'ing people for it altogether?
Yeah, no kidding. But they thought they were doing what was right. Maybe a contributing factor is they were both regular pioneers.
i noticed this on slimboy's list of things that can get you df'd, and i checked it against the "flock" book.. .
there is no mention of blood transfusions!
i know they are downplaying this, but have they stopped df'ing people for it altogether?
Yes sbf. Two cases. Both involving members confessing a guilty conscience of falling in love, one a nonJW, the other a married sister. NO immorality had occurred. They were counseled to not see the person/be alone. When they did and confessed, again no immorality, they were DF'd for "going against counsel." Two different congregations, same circuit.
i noticed this on slimboy's list of things that can get you df'd, and i checked it against the "flock" book.. .
there is no mention of blood transfusions!
i know they are downplaying this, but have they stopped df'ing people for it altogether?
Did somebody mention "Going against counsel?"
