I actually started the "What if it's not true" thinking based on movies and television.
As an elder, I got good at editing talks. Even though a point seemed crucial, I could edit it out and find a way to
make the point without the one I had to cut. This would save time. I started really improving my talks and being
able to convince people with (JW) logic.
I started to analyze the same thing with tv and movies. You can tell why the clue is "stumbled" upon- they need to
get on with the show, no time to carefully figure it out. You can tell when they are going to catch the bad guy or get
a confession in a tv show- when you look at the clock and they have 7 or 8 minutes left. When television got the
characters in a serious situation, with no way out, suddenly there was a way out. IT'S ALL IN THE WRITING.
You can get any situation turned around, solved, you can bring back the dead if you say it was a dream.
If it's all in the writing, then how do you make your point in a public talk? Same way.
Is it possible that the WTS is doing that in the Watchtower? I could not believe I managed that thought.
It was so against the mind control that I was given. Are they just writing in such a way as to defend the
undefendable doctrine? Is it hopeless to prove that Jesus started ruling invisibly in 1914, but a good writer will do it anyway?
YES, it is possible. Is it possible that my doubts about THIS GENERATION are caused by good writers of the
"old light" conflicting with good writers of "new light" ? (To be honest, the new light writers were not as good.)
Maybe both writers were misleading me, keeping me distracted (just like movies and television) so that I stick around.
That's how it developed in my mind.