yk-
Dubula,
I thought I would start a new thread in order to discuss this thought a little further.
thats fine, id be happy to discuss this thought a little further, but id appreciate some answers to my previous questions first. i doubt you will be willing to finish what youve started, and im sure youll think im trying to derail this discussion. im not, and ill be (as i said) more than happy to respond to your specific points on this thread......after the air is cleared on your slanderous remarks towards me.
specifically, on the previous thread you accused me numerous times of being a liar with absolutely no proof. since when is outright slander an acceptable rebuttal? if i say "yk, you are lying with this entire post", would this make it so? should i not show how and why i believe you to be lying, or is simply accusing you enough? ive made specific accusations about your writing (hypocrisy, contradictions), and ive backed these accusations up with specific links and quotes. as of yet, you have not responded to any of the proofs i provided, because you are unable, or because you deem them unworthy. whatever the case, its there, and i do not simply toss around accusations with no proof the way you have a habit of doing. on the previous thread, there was one instance in particular where you SPECIFICALLY said to me: "thats not what you said. but, nevermind that lie". remember? for that particular accusation i posted my EXACT quotes (with a link) which proved unequivically that i did indeed say precisely what you claimed i did not. for this you had no answer, and you decided to continue the discussion on this new thread, and direct the subject matter in your preferred direction as to skip over your obvious errors (intentional or unintentional). i dont know if you truly believe me to be a liar, or if its just your way of maliciously slandering me in order to avoid actual responses (and of course in obvious attempts at discrediting all my responses). either way, it is an extremely poor way of stating your point, and whenever you accuse someone of lying, youd better have some proof. again, calling me a liar doesnt make it so. would this fall into your "thug" definition?
It's not name calling for me to call you what you are. Someone who lies is a liar.
and accusing someone is not proof of lying. again, numerous times youve labeled me a liar, even going so far as to call me a "pathological liar" with absolutely no proof. i challenged you with an extremely simple task: if i have indeed lied, and if i am indeed a "pathological liar" as you imagine me to be, than post these lies for all to see. here is one example for you:
me:
AGAIN, i have NEVER claimed that any specific calamity we are facing now has happened in the past. NOWWHERE IN MY WRITINGS WILL YOU FIND THIS, yet you continue to imply it......why the need for deceit, or is it genuine ignorance on your part? i said "calamities" had happened in the past, that we are facing new ones now, and there are sure to be NEW "calamities" in the future that we cannot even predict now.
your response to this quote was to call me a pathological liar. if this is the case, surely you can tell me what part of this quote is a complete lie, and why. you cannot do this, because there is no lie present. i have backed this up by showing my previous statements, but you have backed up your slander with absolutely nothing. again, proving a lie is a simple task.......cutting and pasting is all that is required. i have done this to prove your lies, but you cannot.
and again, i have no interest in derailing this thread.....we can handle your errors/lies on the other thread if you wish. i just see no reason in trying to have a discussion with you if your main intent is to continue to slander me with absolutely zero substantiation. continuing a discussion with someone who clearly has a malicious intent, and has no genuine interest in logical discourse would be pointless on my part.
one more thing:
I should wake up to the fact that I am dealing with a complete moron
You are truly pathetic. The only reason I might have to be embarrassed is that I have taken so much time trying to reason with a delusional lying fool. / You Know
You are one of the worst cases of brain-lock that I have ever come across.
you are a a lying delusional fool.
I have known a few pathological liars before who would believe there own lies. Apparently you are one of those.
do you recognize the difference between stating your honest opinion of someone, and simply tossing around malicious ridicule in an attempt to discredit? my guess is that you cannot comprehend the difference, and ill tell you why. if any or all of the above statements were your honest opinion of me, you wouldnt start a whole new thread specifically directed at me. if you honestly believe im a delusional pathological liar (and a fool), that i have such severe brain-lock that reasoning with me is pointless, and that im so far below you intellectually that dealing with me is an embarrassing mistake on your part, why the need for a whole new thread to specifically discuss the topic further with ME? surely in all of your vast intellect you realize the enormous contradiction here (or perhaps you cannot see it). so, we can conclude that either A) you do not realize the contradictions in your own words and actions, or B) your slander is intentionally malicious, and in fact direct lies (if you really do not feel i am the delusional lying fool that is not worth your time).
aa
(boy im really fumbling around with this new easier format......and the new updates on every edit really bring my errors to light, thanks simon! )
Edited by - dubla on 13 June 2002 13:3:21
Edited by - dubla on 13 June 2002 13:4:46
Edited by - dubla on 13 June 2002 13:7:14
