Committing sex acts in public is a felony ya know.
no i didnt know that....oops.
aa
that always gets your attention, huh.
ok, i'm watching the "o'reilly factor", they just aired the case of two hs students who engaged in oral sex on a bus in silverlakes maryland while several other students cheered them on and the bus driver did nothing.
the principal of the school system didn't inform the school board until after the local newspaper broke the story and he refuses to say how the students will be punished.
Committing sex acts in public is a felony ya know.
no i didnt know that....oops.
aa
as reported on sky news, this from the pm's news conference some 45 minutes ago:blair firm on iraqthe prime minister says he passionately believes saddam hussein must be disarmed of weapons of mass destruction.
he said britain must show rogue states "that when we say we intend to deal with the issue of weapons of mass destruction, we mean it".
mr blair, giving his monthly downing street news conference, said there was still time for the iraqi dictator to give up his weapons programmes.. but if he did not, he would have to be disarmed by force.. "i know and understand the concerns that people have," mr blair said.
is he mad like the guys in james bond movies? certainly not...
okay, the fact that youre comparing this topic to fictional characters in a movie, clues me in that maybe ive been wasting my time even discussing this with you.
killing the guy is obviously not enough for a media to report.
ill tell you what.....killing the guy over that offense is enough for me to know that hes mentally deranged....read: mad. the "extra juicy stuff" that you imply is fiction, really is irrelevant.
aa
figures hed be back on a thread about nuclear threats......he seems to have toned down his stance quite a bit though, probably realizing that you can only cry wolf so many times before youre no longer heard......hes coming back at it from a more passive angle it seems, maybe to snare some lurkers. obviously he was a joke before, even to the jw lurkers, so maybe this new strategy will work out for him. he wont even respond to old threads now......i brought one up awhile back, where he had said that larouche was calling for financial meltdown by october 2002, but alas, no response.....im sure the resiliency of the markets and the economy has him depressed, lol.
aa
even i was shocked to hear that bill parcells comes out of retirement to coach the cowblows .i think there is even a rumor that troy aikman will come out of retirement to qb .
i don't know what do you think the cowboobs chances are next year?
i am hoping for the best myself .
parcells is a coaching genius, and he could turn the bengals into a winning franchise. i dont care for the cowboys, but i have the utmost respect for parcells and his abilities.....he WILL win in dallas.
aa
as reported on sky news, this from the pm's news conference some 45 minutes ago:blair firm on iraqthe prime minister says he passionately believes saddam hussein must be disarmed of weapons of mass destruction.
he said britain must show rogue states "that when we say we intend to deal with the issue of weapons of mass destruction, we mean it".
mr blair, giving his monthly downing street news conference, said there was still time for the iraqi dictator to give up his weapons programmes.. but if he did not, he would have to be disarmed by force.. "i know and understand the concerns that people have," mr blair said.
realist-
saddam is unscrupulous but he is NOT mad. he knows what he is doing.
it sounds to me like youre under the false assumption that one cannot be intelligent and insane at the same time. or maybe its just your particular definition of the word "mad". heres what dictionary.com has to say on it:
mad:
Suffering from a disorder of the mind; insane
so, we then look up "insanity"
insanity:
Persistent mental disorder or derangement.
so, weve got a definition that basically says a madman would be a man who has a mental disorder, one who is deranged. so you are claiming that hussein cannot possibly have this mental derangement, and i am saying he can and does, even though he is also intelligent. do you think the people behind 9/11 would be considered deranged/mad/insane? personally i consider them mad for the events they planned and caused....yet i also consider them intelligent.
i read an article on hussein once (ive been looking for it lately but cant find it again) about his dealings with one of his top aids. to summarize the story, basically sadaam had a meeting with his top aids, and the subject of whether or not he should temporarily step down came up. all the aids insisted he should never step aside....all but one, who suggested maybe temporarily stepping down might be a good idea, until the smoke blew over. the aid was taken into immediate custody for his suggestion, and thrown into prison. subsequently his wife, upon hearing of his incarceration, begged and pleaded with sadaam to return her husband to her, and hussein promised to do so. he kept his promise, by sending the woman her husband the next day, delivered to her doorstep in a plastic bag, his body chopped into small pieces.
now, please tell me how anyone capable of this type of perverted act can possibly be considered completely sane, in your mind. keep in mind, this is one story, and im sure youve heard many more, most of them even more disgusting and sick than this one. if you think he is not mad, do you also think that charles manson is completely sane, simply because he is intelligent, and "knows what he is doing" (your definition of sanity)?
aa
that always gets your attention, huh.
ok, i'm watching the "o'reilly factor", they just aired the case of two hs students who engaged in oral sex on a bus in silverlakes maryland while several other students cheered them on and the bus driver did nothing.
the principal of the school system didn't inform the school board until after the local newspaper broke the story and he refuses to say how the students will be punished.
. The FACTS were gathered from the BUS DRIVER, who saw what was going on
i highly doubt that unless the driver actually stopped the bus and joined the crowd watching. how in the world could the bus driver see what was going on? did they do it at the front of the bus on the floor right in front of the driver? again, i doubt it. maybe the driver saw a group of kids whooping and cheering, and maybe the driver heard kids yelling about what was going on, but i have a very hard time believing the driver actually SAW it....give me a break.
aa
.
im a huge cowboy fan but i dont think they will make it to the super bowl, damn sure would love to be wrong.
ok here is who i think as of right now pittsburgh stealers and san francisco 49ers and god i hate them both, well thats my pick how about you?
crown-
who was critisizing the jets? all i was doing was going over some predictions.....i predicted the jets wouldnt make it past the second round, because they didnt deserve to be there anyhow, and they proved me right. you predicted the jets would win the super bowl (blindly as any fan does i guess), and they proved you wrong. whats to critisize?
now, i was critisizing pennington, and no hes not a pro-bowl qb, not by a long shot.....one good stretch does not a pro-bowler make. you have to be able to win the big games when its all on the line, and pennington couldnt do that. fiedler hasnt done that either for that matter, which is why he hasnt been to the pro bowl yet. favre on the other hand is a three-time league mvp, so to say pennington is more accurate than favre is a bit ridiculous...no one knows how accurate pennington will be over time. and to say hes "generally more accurate than anyone in the nfl" is just laughable....it was one season! and he basically got to play as an unknown, like brady last year......we shall see if pennington can stand the test of time.
The Raiders pass rush would have made any QB have a tough time
maybe you missed the raiders-dolphins game? fiedler handled that pass rush just fine, and he did what pennington hasnt been able to do, he beat the raiders.......dont make excuses for your golden boy.....he showed his true colors in that game, and id say kitna couldve mounted a better passing game than that. face it, pennington got your hopes up, then showed everyone how he handles pressure.
like i said before, your only real bragging rights are a better division record, considering the dolphins and jets both went 9-7, they split their regular season meetings, and they are both watching the super bowl from their homes. the dolphins didnt deserve to be in the playoffs because they couldnt win when it counted, and the jets didnt deserve to be in the playoffs because they just flat out arent that good of a team (ahem, bears). thank the fish for your short-lived postseason hopes, but the true talent always shows itself, and the jets just didnt have it.
aa
to this date, it has never been proved who is responsible for the atrocities of the twin towers' destruction.
an absolutely appalling act.
who is responsible?
that 6 of the hijackers are alive and well
wow, then they either survived the plane crash (whichever one they were on), or jumped from the plane immediately prior to it crashing.....both astounding feats to say the least!
aa
as reported on sky news, this from the pm's news conference some 45 minutes ago:blair firm on iraqthe prime minister says he passionately believes saddam hussein must be disarmed of weapons of mass destruction.
he said britain must show rogue states "that when we say we intend to deal with the issue of weapons of mass destruction, we mean it".
mr blair, giving his monthly downing street news conference, said there was still time for the iraqi dictator to give up his weapons programmes.. but if he did not, he would have to be disarmed by force.. "i know and understand the concerns that people have," mr blair said.
furthermore, are you saying simply that hussein holding office for 24 years validates his sanity? what exactly are you smoking these days?
as reported on sky news, this from the pm's news conference some 45 minutes ago:blair firm on iraqthe prime minister says he passionately believes saddam hussein must be disarmed of weapons of mass destruction.
he said britain must show rogue states "that when we say we intend to deal with the issue of weapons of mass destruction, we mean it".
mr blair, giving his monthly downing street news conference, said there was still time for the iraqi dictator to give up his weapons programmes.. but if he did not, he would have to be disarmed by force.. "i know and understand the concerns that people have," mr blair said.
realist-
you said assume he isnt a "mad man". i said nothing about him being suicidal, i have no idea if he is or not.......but i surely think youd have to be "crazy" yourself to think the guy isnt a mad man.
aa