It's generally accepted in the West that Al-Queada (sp?) (DMA) were behind the hijackings. Whether this is or not in fact true or not, is another thing. No one has blown the whistle on any conspiracy yet, so the rather predictable counter-story of it being a Zionist plot (like the USS Cole was a Zionist plot, it wasn't a little speedboat, it was an Isreali Harpoon missile with a micro-nuclear warhead) is a little short of evidence. Like chem-trails, you know, the government spraying everyone with mind controling drugs, which is why you see all these smokey trails high in the sky.
Doesn't stop people believing in it. It's equally strong a theory that the situation was allowed to develop, so it could be put down with huge PR effect, and there were concequences no one ever expected.
And that Bush is a corporate whore in cahoots with industry, especially companies with interest in oil or the millitary, and that there is no evidence to link Iraq with any recent terrorism, but it's a damn good excuse for going one up on Daddy and invading Iraq properly, which would mean an oil-rich stategic partner in the area in case Israel or Saudi go balls-up, which is about even odds over the next five years. 'States that use terror' could equally be applied to Israel, yet they get aid... the only missiles they get are still in their packing crates. The recent finding of Nicin in London means that it looks like things are by far from over.
I really don't feel Osama is a fall guy. OsWALD was probably innocent, OsAMA probably isn't. But I don't trust Bush, Blair, or any other of the sons-of-bitches just cause they put a nice spin on it.