Fisherman : If a man’s wife is brazenly going around dating and touching other men or females even though she is not having sexual relations with them is wrong because she is married, and the congregation can sanction her.
Jesus said that "everyone who keeps on looking at a woman so as to have a passion for her has already committed adultery with her in his heart", but JWs do not consider pornography a basis for judicial action unless it involves an entrenched practice of viewing "abhorrent forms of pornography".
When "nonabhorrent" pornography is viewed the only available sanction is that such a person would not be considered exemplary or "qualify for special priveleges".
I cannot see why dating or touching someone you are not entitled to marry should be treated any differently judicially.