Oh I promised myself I wouldn't get involved in these, but, oh well....
Bravo Terry on your reasoning and use of logic. These aren't new arguements, but it does serve to reveal where thiests stand.
For those of you here arguing who are Christian and/or thiests but don't accept the bible or at least the Genesis account, I think it bears mentioning that while perhaps your individual views as to the allegory of Adam and Eve might differ substantially from most Christians, the fact remains that most Christians, and most denominations ACCEPT the allegory of Adam and Eve as the explanation for sin, mans fall from the "grace of god", and why since then god has chosen to not deal with his now unholy creation. (please excuse the run on sentence.)
Belief is just that. Belief. Little Toe debated me a while back and one point he made is that some people need their faith and belief. It isn't my intent to take that away. That isn't my point. However, it is a little disingenuous to answer a question with a question, thus changing the subject. If that is what one does best, why not start your own thread?
The point of using the Adam and Eve account as an example is to show how flawed the logic is, and how mythical all of the events are. If Christians wish to accept Jesus and the bible, yet pick and choose what seems plausible, as they seem to do, then the denominations of Christianity need to address this. But the official dogma is to accept all of the bible as the unerring word of god. Lets not be naieve here and pretend that in the USA that rather loud group doesn't exist, shall we?
I think the point is well made: IF GOD EXISTS THE WAY HE IS DESCRIBED, then he made flawed products and supplied insufficient data to his creation.