What I really miss is preparting 2 meeting parts, 2 shep calls, judical cases, elders meeting, RBC duties, letters to read and file, oh, and the glossy eyed, upset, depressed people.
Yeah, I miss that.
i saw 6 jw zombies walking up a hill near where i live the other day.
they all were dressed nicely.
they walked together in twos.
What I really miss is preparting 2 meeting parts, 2 shep calls, judical cases, elders meeting, RBC duties, letters to read and file, oh, and the glossy eyed, upset, depressed people.
Yeah, I miss that.
first of all, lets head off some potential problems before they start.
i am not doing this thread to argue.
if you would like to, thats fine.
But what I was trying to get at was the altruistic love we see so often, as well as the idiotic romantic love, serve no purpose in an evolutionary or survival of the fittest sense, so when John the writer of the letters , says "God is Love" does that mean that when we love, we bring God in to existence ?
Not that "He" exists, but that we create him by our love ?
Wobble, I think you are on to something there. As a philosophy in the abstract, it can work. Having said that, you don't need to call it this to love others. It merely is an interpretation, but doesn't prove the superiority of Christianity, nor is Christianity necesarry to believe this if you want to have this philosophy as your own personal religion.
a few weeks back, in the midst of the haiti tragedy, much discussion took place in cyberland about the tolerance [or indeed the insistence on] suffering by a loving god.
the furor over haiti has settled a bit [as unfortunately most tragedy is wont to do far too quickly in the human mind], but this persistent matter continues to chew at my subconscience.
today i came across this:.
Oh, the illogic of the Bible, with Seas parting, Floods happening, families through incest (Lot and his merry daughters) and the "investigation" of Sodom and Gomorrah before they were "salted" away.
And that's just Genesis and Exodus.
Yup, lots of logic.....
first of all, lets head off some potential problems before they start.
i am not doing this thread to argue.
if you would like to, thats fine.
Hi all. If I should have said Jesus is God the Son, then that is what I meant. I apologize for my over simplification.
PSac, I haven't done a 180. If anything, I probably line up with more of your vibe then I do say AKJeff on my feelings that I think a higher power exists. I also think love is the #1 thing a human can do for another. (thus the many questions AKJeff has about god, which are most valid)
AllTimeJeff, If I may say this, and you are free to disagree with me. Everyone, regardless of what they say or how they act, everyone has a religion, a faith in something.
This looks like a semantics problem where you have your own definitions for words, so I would rather steer clear of that. I don't know from my point of view how you can say everyone has their own religion. I would allow you that perhaps, faith is something we all have, but religion? Not me.
a few weeks back, in the midst of the haiti tragedy, much discussion took place in cyberland about the tolerance [or indeed the insistence on] suffering by a loving god.
the furor over haiti has settled a bit [as unfortunately most tragedy is wont to do far too quickly in the human mind], but this persistent matter continues to chew at my subconscience.
today i came across this:.
As usual, I appreciate you PSac.
AKJeff, don't sweat the small stuff (aka Perry's "responses") He is clearly wired to defend his god so much that he will do whatever he can to win an argument, be that minimizing or demonizing an argument, dodge, ask a question to answer a question, literally every technique he learned as a JW.
i think she should just try to bring it.
she's out-gunned.. .
Quayle fought Murphy Brown. Bush I fought The Simpsons. Palin picks on Family Guy.
....and rural Kansas rejoiced!
first of all, lets head off some potential problems before they start.
i am not doing this thread to argue.
if you would like to, thats fine.
First of all, lets head off some potential problems before they start. I am not doing this thread to argue. If you would like to, thats fine. Also, I totally understand and allow that someones individual beliefs as a Christian might be very different from the organized religion I am referring to here.
Ok, here goes.
In thinking about the claims Christians in general make, overall, they feel they worship the one true god, Jesus. You will frequently hear statements that Jesus saves us from our sins, that Jesus will protect his people, destroy the wicked. (if you don't think he will destroy the wicked, thats fine, I talk to people everyday who says he will do that to non Christians. So lets acknowledge that these kinds of Christians are out there)
Then there is the matter of those who learn evolution and see that science and the bible are at odds when a literal reading is done. Of course, if it requires more then a literal reading, my next question is, who gets to interpret these supposedly non literal passages. You? Me?
Then there is the problem of the accident of your birth. Christianity as a percentage is somewhere in the 12-15% range depending on the numbers you choose to use. Hardly an overwhelming number for the one true religion.
I personally continue to see that there isn't a lot of acknowledgment on the above issues. While on the one hand, they feel their way worship is best, their god superior. Yet other religions claim the exact same thing with their holy book, their deities, and their dogma and explanations. All sides who make such claims have the exact same evidence.
While doubt is mentioned by some as a key ingredient to a healthy faith, in the bible, it is also condemned. Even if you personally don't condemn it, most Christians do. And what about doubters who are scientists, rationalists, humanists, who are only being intellectually honest with the questions and objections they raise?
If asked, I don't mind saying that I am Christian, much in the same way Catholics say they are Catholic. (i.e. they were raised that way, that is their identity) I come from a Judeo-Christian background in a Judeo-Christian world. So that is indelibly part of me. However, I don't worship the Christian god, I am a cultural Christian. (btw, if that offends, I won't make a big deal out of it if you don't want to call me a Christian, that isn't my point...)
What I see as a problem is the sheer number/math issue. God is god. You can't all be right. Yet, Christians are a minority. Even if that isn't the point, the fact that the majority of the world believe differently due to background, culture, etc, seems to put their lives at danger.
What will Jesus do with the continent of Asia? Burn it? They can't possibly be saved. Muslims? Sure is a shame that over a billion people are born into a hatred of Christianity. These poor people never have a chance. Is that their fault?
So why believe that you have the best religion, the best god, that your beliefs are superior, when for most people on planet earth, they are not? And what does that say about your god that most people truly don't have even a remote chance of ever converting, ever learning about Jesus, due to the accident of their birth?
The smaller the world gets, the less important religion becomes.
i think she should just try to bring it.
she's out-gunned.. .
So, Fox news is bashing Fox network for airing such a cruel program.
You speak the truth Billy. I think this all the time.
Meanwhile, on liberal NBC, Parenthood the TV show debuts next week. Lots of LGBT parents on that one... ;)
a few weeks back, in the midst of the haiti tragedy, much discussion took place in cyberland about the tolerance [or indeed the insistence on] suffering by a loving god.
the furor over haiti has settled a bit [as unfortunately most tragedy is wont to do far too quickly in the human mind], but this persistent matter continues to chew at my subconscience.
today i came across this:.
I know BTS. My point is, sometimes the emotions of any debater here can obscure the arguments. I share many of AK Jeff's observations on the matter. (not all, many) and as such, his feelings are not the point per se.
Your angry verbiage suggests that there are deeper roots than a mere intellectual disagreement. Is God like an absent Father to you? Or even an abusive one?
I follow your reasoning, and it is an interesting counter argument, but it also suggests that the reasons for AK Jeffs (or mine for that matter) objection on how "god" potentially handles suffering is more of an emotional reaction then an objective observation on what AKJ has discussed. As if demanding accountablity from the god who wants/demands/asks for our worship is a bad thing.
If AKJeff's points are "angry verbiage" that suggest deeper roots, to me, I have to say, that obscures the argument AKJeff presented and attempts a bit of armchair psychology to boot. Personally, I do not perceive what you do.
a few weeks back, in the midst of the haiti tragedy, much discussion took place in cyberland about the tolerance [or indeed the insistence on] suffering by a loving god.
the furor over haiti has settled a bit [as unfortunately most tragedy is wont to do far too quickly in the human mind], but this persistent matter continues to chew at my subconscience.
today i came across this:.
Why be mad at the emotions of AK Jeff and instead focus on the actions/inactions that is causing the being pissed off state?