The letter is too short.
believe me, if I'm wrong, not only will I not care, I will really really not care. But this seems fishy....
boe - confidential.
instruction: press the 'skip ad' button top right, you should then see the download screen more easily.
no virus ;-).
The letter is too short.
believe me, if I'm wrong, not only will I not care, I will really really not care. But this seems fishy....
within the last few hours, two separate posters, watchtower87 and pixel, independently posted news of a april 22nd, 2014 letter to the boe regarding a change in how elders are to be appointed and deleted:.
boe - pdf - confidential 2014-04-22 adjustment in process for appointing elders and minisletter to boe: adjustment in process for appointing elders and ministerial servantswhat i found very interesting is the letterhead and the signature.
they are both from "the governing body of jehovah's witnesses" and not from "the christian congregation of jehovah's witnesses.".
This is unusual. I doubt both sources. I strongly suggest to take this with a grain of salt.
this goes against a tradition of strict control. There's no good reason for the GB to do this. None.
boe - confidential.
instruction: press the 'skip ad' button top right, you should then see the download screen more easily.
no virus ;-).
This isn't real. A policy change that big would have a letter longer than that.
for some people, the world is always ending.
http://thoughtcatalog.com/jeff-dinnell/2013/01/for-some-people-the-world-is-always-ending/.
bangalore.
Great blog and nicely Put.
Its a a difficult lesson to learn that there are certain kinds of people who will always look for certain things that fit their personality. Some people are looking for the world to end because they don't like the world. I remember at Gilead a sister was interviewed, a missionary, who said she did not miss being "in the world at all." It struck me that I was with a group of people you just simply didn't like majority of normal people in the world. I think all Jehovah's Witnesses who are serious about this religion are like that. They don't fit in, or don't want to fit in. They are malcontents. All they want is to have companionship with a group who feels the same way.
That way, instead of having their stupid thinking challenged, they can be around a bunch of head nodders to reinforce their defective thinking.
There is no changing someone else. It's hard enough to change yourself. It's harder still to find a genuine circle of friends who feel and can agree with some things you believe. I wish the human race could get wise to the idea that agreement and companionship is not as important as growing and learning and taking more people into your circle. Jehovah's Witnesses and groups like them are designed to keep anyone or anything that disagrees out.
of course, some people like to stay stuck in the little rut they are in. They never leave the county. Don't ever read anything that disagrees with their emotionally charged beliefs. These are the people that don't change the world. They get left behind. Waiting for the world to end while their curmudgeonly little life passes them by.
it's going to be embarrassing for a lot of Jehovah's Witnesses when 2014 passes. Then it turns into 2024. The world will still be here. And probably a lot of people who may leave Jehovah's Witnesses will just simply go to the next cult that encourages them not to join polite society.
16-20. we shall also have to raise up against him seven shepherds, yes, eight dukes of mankind.mic.
what is the most important thing that you can do now to prepare for any future attack on gods people?.
all of us must be ready to obey any instructions we may receive, whether these appear sound from a strategic or human standpoint or not.. .
Great treatment. With GB 2.0 (are we up to version 2.1 now?) they have a tradition to uphold, the tradition of typology. Typology typically means looking for relationships between OT & NT characters. The GB has stretched that to apply it to the 19-21st century existence of JWs.
this article makes Freddy "the oracle" Franz seem readable. There are no conclusions. These are assertions. This is a bible story that history can barely prove true from archaeology. Obviously, not all of it is true. It's a fable that through an accident of history, got picked up by the powers that be and is now given senseless devotion because it is lumped in a book that is thought if as the unerring word of god.
From the JW point of view, all articles and teachings reinforce the power and agenda of the GB. This power is expressed through the elders. There's actually nothing complicated about this at all.
I personally look back on my experiences, and my biggest lesson is this: Be a student of everything, but be no man or groups disciple. Always check out when you are asked to trade in yourself for someone else's agenda.
you all should be ashamed of your egotistical selves.
how can you leave god's organization to celebrate the work of satan the devil?
it just goes to show you how jehovah's christian witnesses are correct about how persons will leave the truth for their own selfish desires.. first off, christmas is a pagan holiday and it proves no spirit with the almighty jehovah and his son, the christ.
Merry Xmas!!
just in case anyone on either side has delusions of grandeur, JWs will leave when they're ready, not because of this thread. And they won't stay because of this thread either.
And if either side stays or goes because of this thread, your life will continue to suck.
Otherwise, have some internet fun with this piƱata of a troll. Just don't aim for his head, nothing will come out.
if a brother wants to reach out to be elder, yet brothers are holding him back for dubious reasons, can/should a brother approach the co and ask him what he needs to be done to be appointed or perhaps having a discussion along the lines of why the elders are holding him unfairly back.
anybody have any experiences along these lines?
is this a good strategy?
Every elder body is different. Whether that was part of the plan or not, there is no consistency with bodies of elders, beyond certain dogmatic basics. And even then, the dynamic will change based on BOE chosen variables like "mercy", "justice", "zeal", etc.
if a brother wants to reach out to be elder, yet brothers are holding him back for dubious reasons, can/should a brother approach the co and ask him what he needs to be done to be appointed or perhaps having a discussion along the lines of why the elders are holding him unfairly back.
anybody have any experiences along these lines?
is this a good strategy?
The whole subset on this discussion is a simple matter of organizational politics. All businesses and religions have them.
In JW land, you have to be pretty secure to disagree with a CO, and then, handle it the right way. (i.e. don't ever come across as not liking the CO, the BOE, etc. Don't make it seem personal.)
In most cases, there needs to be unanimous agreement on appointments and deletions. Few fights based on principle occur, because most elders (who were smart politically and thats how they became elders in the first place) know that it simply isn't worth it in the long run. If you get a reputation, or if your cong BOE gets a reputation, that is awfully hard to shed. And a CO with an agenda against you is a mighty major pain in the @$$. Don't start fights you can't win is something that has been working within the walls of JW's for over 100 years now. (well, except that whole 1914 thing..... )
if a brother wants to reach out to be elder, yet brothers are holding him back for dubious reasons, can/should a brother approach the co and ask him what he needs to be done to be appointed or perhaps having a discussion along the lines of why the elders are holding him unfairly back.
anybody have any experiences along these lines?
is this a good strategy?
It can work both ways and I've seen it. This mostly occurs if a body of elders recommends someone that for whatever reason, the CO doesn't want to approve. If that happens, and they don't work this out at the elders meeting with the CO, than the CO will forward his letter as to why he doesn't approve of the appointment, along with the elders explaining why they disagre with the CO, along with the summary on the CO's report. In almost all cases, the Service Dept will side with the CO.
In some cases, an elder moves from another congregation and the appointment is held up. If the CO likes the former elder, and there is no "organizational" reason that has been violated, then he will be appointed, even if the new congregation elders don't want it.
There are some "problem" brothers (whom I've since come to learn, have a soul and a mind that they haven't quite wholesaled out to the Borg) whom don't get along with the elders very well, and are always in the CO's ear. Whether they be MS or not, typically, the CO has to ultimately make a call as to whom he will support. If the BOE has a good reputation, the complaining brother will always lose. If for whatever reason, the BOE and their congregation isn't doing good, and the brother can make a good argument, his chances of getting approved do go up.
It is very situational. Bottom line, it is the exception and not the rule when both the BOE and CO do not agree, and yes, a huge portion of that reason is the politics involved.
the other week we had a public talk by a brother who surprised me and piqued my interest by describing the origin of religion as resulting from a desire for power, and from fear and superstition.
he was running with the ball so well, but he tripped and landed on his face before he got to the 20 yard line.. i'm not entirely sure what his thought process was.
if i didn't happen to know him, i'd think he was trying to drop a ttatt bomb, but he's way too, well, er, simple-minded to be duplicitous like that.
This sounds like a confused elder who doesn't get the outlline from the borg. Public Talks have been tightened up since I left. They are cardboard boring now, with the occasional loose cannon thrown in. :)