I believe that the father (John Doe) is the ONLY one that should be held responsible for his actions. Just because this person was raised in a Jehovah's Witness environment, doesn't mean that the Jehovah's Witness congregation is to blame for the actions of one of it's members, in his own home, on his own time.
They are not the keepers of the adults or the keeper of that particular adult's children, but only a group that has views that are different from other groups, many which I do not agree with. And yes there are many cases of JWs related to child abuse, but this case doesn't fit the profile of the entire congregation being sued, as far as the information that we have to go on. The congregation did not abuse this woman. Just because they weren't there for her, doesn't mean they condoned this type of behavior. How do we even know she even went to the Jehovah's Witnesses for help? Why is the congregation being sued? Why can't we just prosecute the person who is liable and not everyone that happens to cross that person's path?
~Xirian~