i'm new to the forum but have lurked for over four years!
in fact i've never even posted on an internet board before,.
so please go easy on me.
Gerard wrote : What I wonder is what are the JWs saying now that their Beast, the UN, is actualy trying to avoid war?
Oh man, wait a moment. The european/russian/chinese-alliance (I told before) has ATHEISTIC roots now. Maybe they will tepresent the tool in the hands of god to keep away "babylon the great". The US-army certainly not. They are too weak, and they are tools of para-christiany sects and fundamental groups....
i'm new to the forum but have lurked for over four years!
in fact i've never even posted on an internet board before,.
so please go easy on me.
Possibly the whole world will be brought into a contrary position against the anglo-american army... Nobody is presently able to foresee or anticipate the outcome of a war against Irak. A french/german/russian/chinese-alliance is stronger than the US-army. If the world of muslims falls out of control (during the war, perhaps as a result of using mini-nukes etc.), there MUST come a strong army to stop the chaos. In such a period of time the US-army is completely TOO WEAK at all to get control over the chaotic situation! They can recruit only about 500 000 soldiers (maximum, because they have no compulsory military service more) - but you need more than 50 millions to stand against 1 trillion muslem-people !!!
Do you now understand the prophesy of the bible in a new and better way? I hope so....!
E.
.
millions have protested against bush and his blood for oil war all across europe and the world!.
there is still hope for peace!
roybatty wrote: A few questions for the war protestors... One, where were you guys when Saddam was killing thousands of his own citizens right after the Gulf war?<
Another question:
Where were the US-troops when Saddam killed thousands of his own citizens (after the golf war, and before the golf war) ??
E.
with all the emphasis put on armageddon in the org.
can we throw away all the signs that jesus gave, just because we quit being a jw?.
does armageddon scare you as much as when you were a jw?
Armageddon is a fact for all people - and it has to have an effect to all people. No matter if you were muslim or buddist or christ or atheist. Whether JW or not JW: That`s no question at all...
E.
george bush's administration and the government is at it again, warning americans to buy among other things sheets of plastic and duct tape, select a panic room in the home, and seal every orifice to prevent biological, chemical or radioactive agents from seeping through any cracks.
nevermind that those successful enough to seal a room completely air-tight will suffocate long before they become deceased from airborne agents of warfare.
how many of you are concerned the ugly turn of events worldwide portends the great tribulation leading to armageddon?
JT wrote: even if the nations start a worldwide nuclear war it will not end with jw sitting under some fig tree...<
You cannot deny that such a war would mean Armageddon - can you? The outcome of such a war may not satisfy WTS. Maybe many JW`s would die; and other people, never expected to leave alive, would survive.... The bible tells, that armageddon is not OUR war, and we cannot determine our own survive. Also, the WTS cannot. Regardless of the final outcome, the survivers have to accept the facts; and they WILL GO TO INSTALL THE NEW WORLD ORDER as prophesied in the bible. With or without the WTS? Nobody knows it actually. That is depending on being found as "the true slave" or "the evil slave", and this question will be answered in the very last days; not yet.
E.
6 reasons why so many allies want bush to slow down .
by johanna mcgeary.
sunday, january 26, 2003.
Yeru: What Majority of what countries? 16 of the 19 Nato members SUPPORT the US.
NATO-members represent only a very small part of the world. There are more than 250 countries world-wide; but only 19 NATO-members. Ask the people in Afrika or Asia or South America or in the neutral European countries about war against Iraq. Do you believe there would be a majority?
E.
6 reasons why so many allies want bush to slow down .
by johanna mcgeary.
sunday, january 26, 2003.
USA will probably leave NATO - and even the UN - after a war that they had to strike ALONE. Regardless of the outcome... The result then (finally): Europe and similar industrial countries will stand absolutely unprotected against following attacks coming from islamics fundamentalists or other dangerous groups in the future. US can withdraw their troops and flee into "splendid isolation". Europe can not.
E.
6 reasons why so many allies want bush to slow down .
by johanna mcgeary.
sunday, january 26, 2003.
Alan: Does anyone know if France and German have actually sold weapons to Iraq?
Everyone knows that nearly ALL industrial countries sold weapons to Irak in the 80ies. USA too.
E.
6 reasons why so many allies want bush to slow down .
by johanna mcgeary.
sunday, january 26, 2003.
I think its too late to change the present situation and to come to a solution without war. There are now about 120,000 US-troops around Irak. It would be an enormous loss in political prestige for Bush to withdraw the troops. No I think they cannot. They are sitting in a self-made trap. On the one side they certainly know, that there is a minimal chance to overrun the Iraq within a very short time. But they know they must win within very short time; because if the war lasts longer than 2 weeks, the opinion of the whole world will turn against the US-troops. Further, a long-lasting war would surely implicate the use of mini-nukes and other extreme weapons, and the Irakian civilists would suffer miserably and horribly. That situation would bring ALL muslims up against USA. Now, in this tribulation, the rest of the US- and NATO-allies will withdraw their consent. The UN anyway, from the beginning.. The United States stand alone then; completely. I think Mr. Bush and his advisers did never consider these aspects carefully enough.
The present world situation is the most dangerous since 1945.
E.
what if we lose the war with iraq?
i watch the news and all commentators act as if our winning is a given.
yes, we are the biggest, baddest nation; we have the nukes, but what if?
The present situation is completely different, compared with that situation 60 years ago...
NOBODY can stop millions of fanatical terrorists if they indeed are ready to use suicide-bombs. No USA, no UN; absolutely nobody. One little chance would be to WIPE OUT the religious base; e.g. when they see that they had really much to lose if they die. As long as a GI or other western soldier is not fanatical enough to offer his life for an ideology, but a muslim etc. is - as long you cannot win a war against suicide- terror. NEVER. Sorry, there is a world situation now US-people often cannot understand. Even the WTS cannot understand it exactly. Thats very sad.
E.
