Red didn't do that kind of material about his wife. I think what you've got
there is Henny Youngman:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7ZBpUdRHdM
glenster
JoinedPosts by glenster
-
2
Red Skelton's Tips For A Happy Marriage
by Bangalore in1. two times a week, we go to a nice restaurant, have a little beverage, good food and companionship.
she goes on tuesdays, i go on fridays.. 2. we also sleep in separate beds.
hers is in california and mine is in texas.. 3. i take my wife everywhere.....but she keeps finding her way back.. 4. i asked my wife where she wanted to go for our anniversary.
-
glenster
-
8
Stem cell research gets the go ahead
by glenster inhttp://news.discovery.com/human/stem-cells-lines-research.html.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/stem_cell_treatments.
-
-
34
"Is It Latter Than You Think" Article in Awake
by Leprechaun inmary christmas - article in the awake i think it was 1969 or1968 there is a picture of two passenger jets flying into the world trade center buildings, now, what do you think of that.
now, that was some thirty years in advance, and a little more than coincidence.
what the hells up with that folks?
-
-
39
Will the 10th planet cause an "Armageddon"?
by HappyGuy ini hope this dude is wrong.. http://www.kkglorychurch.com/z-the%20end%20of%20the%20world.htm.
-
-
-
-
-
glenster
Cartoons
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r44GKiNWzig
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_0pHHiNXGUFeaturette
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IllTFle91vA
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHQCF12QvfcDocumentary
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJpm3Uh_ogUFeatures
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G2dsfwHjCTM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qLBWdcDdnSg
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-27Qm1wGBE
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ia8yjBrG1Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnKG8C-svaM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ha63nwcg7Ug
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d7xYD4f1sO0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePIeKClCQ4Y
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Dd93_2MWkpI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFTrn9Np4y -
3
What is the bibles view on Abortion?
by LucyA injust wondering which scriptures people use to be anti-choice?.
because i cant recall any that even mention it.. .
-
-
17
Comparing Jesus and Santa
by AK - Jeff ini do not have my watchtower cdrom installed on this box.
i recall a quote by the watchtower some years back that said in effect;.
"if you teach your kids about santa claus, and they find out it was all a lie, they might begin to think that what you taught them about jesus is also a lie.".
-
glenster
I have friends who do or don't believe in God--I just don't like it if either
get 'centric about it. Taken to the extreme, that's the real danger as many of
either kind have shown. Whichever you pick, "proof" or "lie" about God is a
forced choice that's unfriendly regarding the believer and disrespects what they
actually do. There's knowing or not that you're doing something in faith in a
possible God.The extremists on either end have more in common than they realize--trying to
prove there's a God by saying they'll show you the ark of animals or digging in
the hill to analyze the animal fossils and prove there isn't. It's like they're
both trying to watch the sun come up by staring intently into the west. It's a
faith matter.If either hurts anyone, I'm with you in being against it. But you want to
guard against joining the 'centric ones of either group. They're the ones that
really waste your life. -
13
Another problem for the WT, Isaiah 44:24
by Chalam inhere's a problem for the wt with their god father and "a god" son theology.. the wt major on proverbs 8 and give the title of "master worker" to jesus and insert the word "[other]" into john 1:3 colossians 1:16 etc.. however, there are plenty of scriptural problems, consider this one.
isaiah 44:24 (new international version) 24 "this is what the lord says .
your redeemer, who formed you in the womb: .
-
glenster
I think the most common stance the JWs leaders have used is that nobody could
imagine phrasing to indicate God's own wisdom personified and sent to people, so
that can't be what was meant at the time (by John 1:1, etc.), so nobody should
think it. Except who cares if the JWs leaders say they can't imagine it--they
did at the time, in the wisdom literature.What I have on it is on pp.6b-10 at the next link.
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn6b.htm"A redundant and cruel God should inspire no one." True. If all there was
were the bad things about God or life it wouldn't be worth it, but it is. It's
the 'centric believers or non-believers make the worst problems of the see-able,
touchable world--no faith or metaphisics required to know it.It's been said that nothing has cause more unnecessary hurt over the years
than belief in God.I say take the ones who were on the offense in religious war, not those on the
defense or a lot of nice believers who didn't take part,
take the ones who were on the offense in state atheism, not those on the
defense or a lot of nice non-believers who didn't take part,
take the ones on the offense regarding race, such as those who lynched African
Americans or threw them off slave ships like they were just chattel because the
food supply got low, not those on the defense or who wouldn't take part,
same with nationality, etc.,
http://www.freewebs.com/glenster1/gtjbrooklyn43.htmand gather all those 'centric people together and nothing has caused more
unnecessary hurt or death in the world than them--people getting too 'centric.
That's when the walls of alienation go up, and people distrust or even hate
who's on the other side, and people get hurt or killed, and you don't need that
any more than I do. I think that focuses more clearly on the problem and
doesn't mischaracterize a lot of nice people (as by characterizing them by the
worst of them or as having a hope commitment to be cruel to others or such).We're never going to have all the same believers or non-believers, race, etc.
We can get more relaxed about the differences. That's the real modern, forward
thinking way for people to get along. -
13
Mass Murder
by cantleave inknowing that most people condemn ethnic cleansing and the extermination of the jews, how do you as a jw's rationalise mass murder by god at armageddon?.
i always had problems reconcilling this and was wondering if anyone really could..
-
glenster
^ Ironically, too unbalanced.The God concept has to be reconciled with the good AND bad of the world--
of 1,000 BC, today, or tomorrow--that He's thought to preside over. A purely
bad characterization would be as much a mischaracterization as characterizing
the world as just bad. Job wouldn't have found any reason to believe in God or
just life generally.I don't like the law of the land being religion--and you don't want to neglect
to add state atheism--instead of separation of church and state because I don't
think people should be hurt or killed over either one (in the case of religion,
short of a divine intervention, and I haven't seen one). (See the list of links
at the next link.)
http://glenster1.webs.com/gtjbrooklyn43.htmLikewise, the JWs leaders are notably controlling and use uniquely harsh
shunning rules, go beyond faith in the possible God to misusing research sources
to make specialties seem substantiated, not characteristic of what goes on
generally or necessary to personal faith.To characterize all of religion or faith by the worst examples above glosses
over Jesus and followers not requiring a country with a militia to defend it or
people executed if they deflect, to go among the Jews and Gentiles without
giving offense, sacrificing of the self to gain others for God, etc. The people
who came along centuries later and made it or Islam the law of the land were a
regression, not an improvement.Faith is a personal choice like subjective freedom about what song you like.
There is no religious or anti-religious authority who can stop that. The thing
to worry about as a way people get hurt unnecessarily isn't God or not God,
this or that nationality, race, etc. It's when people get too 'centric about
any of them that they show unfair regard or treatment of others that you have to
worry about them (see the same link as above).