jdough

Joined

• started 7 topics
• posted 22 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Topics Started by jdough

• 
  1

  New 144,000 article and much, much more

  by jdough in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  http://www.144000.110mb.com/

  1. 
• 

  New 144,000 article

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  http://144000.110mb.com/index.html

  the new, lengthy, paper entitled why the jehovahs witnesses are wrong teaching: - that only 144,000 go to heaven; - that the great crowd of revelation 7:9 is standing on earth; - that the first resurrection began in 1918; - that resurrected man can be educated to perfection; - that jesus christ, the angel, is no longer needed after the thousand year reign and is therefore dispensed with; - and much more

  can be found here:

• 

  jerusalem 607 change of web address

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  for those interested in whether jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 i have placed the article "why jehovah's witnesses are wrong in believing jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site.

  the old web site: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  the new web site: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/

• 
  1

  Jerusalem 607 change of web address notice

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  for those interested in whether jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 i have placed the article "why jehovah's witnesses are wrong in believing jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site.

  the old web site: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  the new web site: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/

  1. 
• 
  14

  587/607

  by reneeisorym in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  i read this and i don't believe the tablets that prove 587 would disprove the bible.

  so can you help me figure out what the bible really says about the fall?.

  counting back from that date, and adding up what they have discerned to be the reigns of each king, 605 bce is found to be the first year of mighty king nebuchadnezzar.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  34

  Discussion with Elder....a must read story

  by drew sagan in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  for those who don't know i've been 'inactive' for around one year.

  i stopped attending meetings late last year.

  all during this time i was working on my wife (known on this board as amber rose), helping her see the problems with the watchtower.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  5

  607 proven wrong via scripture

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i dare anyone to prove me wrong.

  http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607

  roll up your sleeves.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  11

  New Jerusalem 607 B.C.E. web Site

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  there is a new web site devoted to the false claim by jehovah's witnesses that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 b.c.e.

  please feel free to link to the site.

  http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  9

  Jerusalem was not Destroyed in 607 B.C.E. New Web Site

  by jdough in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  there is a new web site devoted to the false claim by jehovah's witnesses that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 b.c.e.

  please feel free to link to the site.

  http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 
  13

  Has anyone seen this research on 607 and the Watchtower?

  by lurker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i was recently searching the web for information on 607 to discuss with my wife and i came up with this.

  http://www.jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/607/default.html these people say that they are proving the watchtowers 607 date correct.

  i am convinced that the watchtower is wrong because of all the other things that i have researched but i would welcome any feedback.

  1. 
  2. 
  3.