jdough

Joined

• started 7 topics
• posted 22 times   see topics posted on
• send a message

Posts by jdough

• 

  jerusalem 607 change of web address

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. experiences

  for those interested in whether jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 i have placed the article "why jehovah's witnesses are wrong in believing jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site.

  the old web site: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  the new web site: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/

• 

  jdough

  For those interested in whether Jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 I have placed the article "Why Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong in believing Jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site. The OLD WEB SITE: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/ The NEW WEB SITE: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/ The new web site can be bookmarked.
• 
  1

  Jerusalem 607 change of web address notice

  by jdough in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  for those interested in whether jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 i have placed the article "why jehovah's witnesses are wrong in believing jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site.

  the old web site: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  the new web site: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/

  1. 
• 

  jdough

  For those interested in whether Jerusalem was actually destroyed in 607 I have placed the article "Why Jehovah's Witnesses are wrong in believing Jerusalem was destroyed in 607" on a new web site. The OLD WEB SITE: http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/ The NEW WEB SITE: http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/ The new web site can be bookmarked.
• 
  9

  Jerusalem was not Destroyed in 607 B.C.E. New Web Site

  by jdough in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  there is a new web site devoted to the false claim by jehovah's witnesses that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 b.c.e.

  please feel free to link to the site.

  http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  thank you. I placed the site here also for bookmarking.
• 
  9

  Jerusalem was not Destroyed in 607 B.C.E. New Web Site

  by jdough in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  there is a new web site devoted to the false claim by jehovah's witnesses that jerusalem was destroyed in 607 b.c.e.

  please feel free to link to the site.

  http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough
• 
  42

  Another 607 / 587 BCE question, How do JW's fix the 20 years ??

  by run dont walk in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  ok, since all the evidence and people/scholars etc, all agree that jerusalem was destroyed in 587/586 bce and not 607 bce.

  how do the jw's get the extra 20 years, i understand the 2520 years and going back from 1914. but alot of the proof goes by adding up the kings reigns, and it gets you to the 587/586 date, do jw's simply add on a few years for each king, or is their a mystery king that ruled for 20 years that only they know about.. hhhhhhmmmmmmm.

  hope my question makes sense.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  the answer is here http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/
• 
  44

  New 607 Website

  by TheListener in

  1. watchtower
  2. beliefs

  a pro jw 607 website.

  check it out.

  if you're loved ones start searching the net for proof of 607 they may regurgitate some of the info.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  the answer is here http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/
• 
  13

  Has anyone seen this research on 607 and the Watchtower?

  by lurker in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i was recently searching the web for information on 607 to discuss with my wife and i came up with this.

  http://www.jehovahsjudgment.co.uk/607/default.html these people say that they are proving the watchtowers 607 date correct.

  i am convinced that the watchtower is wrong because of all the other things that i have researched but i would welcome any feedback.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  The answer is here. http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/
• 
  129

  607, 70 years, 1914

  by crazies in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  sorry for the long post!.

  what the watchtower society says:.

  24 the book of truthful historical dates ***.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  http://www.jonathan.freehyperspace.com/ It is harmonized here.
• 
  11

  need help re 607 date

  by hosebracket in

  1. jw
  2. friends

  i am new to this.. i have a problem.

  someone on my ministry asked me about the date that we hold so dear....607 bce and asked me to prove it to them.

  this would not be a problem i thought as the f&ds would have solid basis for using such a date.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  the answer is here http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/
• 
  129

  607, 70 years, 1914

  by crazies in

  1. watchtower
  2. bible

  sorry for the long post!.

  what the watchtower society says:.

  24 the book of truthful historical dates ***.

  1. 
  2. 
  3. 
• 

  jdough

  the answer is here http://www.geocities.com/jerusalem607/