Um.....6,000,000,000 people total, divided by 3,000 WTC casualties = 2,000,000 days of WTC disasters.
Approx. 5,480 years.
Expatbrit
why are people here said happy birthday..cheers..etc etc which that are against in jehovah's eyes when it is jehovahs witness forum here ?
dont they see that its is j e h o v a h s - w i t n e s s forum ?
i am so confused and i am so lost.
Um.....6,000,000,000 people total, divided by 3,000 WTC casualties = 2,000,000 days of WTC disasters.
Approx. 5,480 years.
Expatbrit
why are people here said happy birthday..cheers..etc etc which that are against in jehovah's eyes when it is jehovahs witness forum here ?
dont they see that its is j e h o v a h s - w i t n e s s forum ?
i am so confused and i am so lost.
run! run! it's a den of apostates! they're all aposi43ki3-90domhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
.
who is in a funk.... *hugs to you*.
cuz i hate to see people in a funk (especially when i am slow in chat, and they leave after saying they are in a funk, and i don't get to give them a cyber hug "in person").
Hey Rizzie! Sorry to hear about your knotting stomach. This campaign has been on my mind too. I think you have the right idea about not answering your door. Screen your phone too.
If you happen to see them on the street, just don't talk to them. Walk right on by (maybe walk like a catwalk model, for fun). Remember, anything you say to them that isn't abject acceptance of their self-perceived authority can be used against you. So don't say anything!
Keep the pointy chin up!
Best wishes
Expatbrit (for the next 3 months a.k.a. "The Man In The Iron Mask"
here is an article by hank hanagraff, a bible apologist from " equip.org.".
here is why he feels chrisianity is different from other religions.
( your comments?
The fact is, Jesus Himself is a figure of history.
So was Mohammed. So was Joseph Smith. So was Siddartha Gautama. So was Akhenaten. A persons existence says nothing about the accuracy of their religious beliefs.
only Jesus claimed to be God in human flesh
Underlying assumption: claiming to be God in human flesh is a valid determinator for the "true" religion. First the underlying assumption must be demonstrated to be valid. Only then can particular cases be gauged using the assumption.
Jesus is not the only religious leader to have claimed to be God (or a God) in human flesh.
this is not an empty claim because it is supported by Christs historically verifiable resurrection from the dead
Good grief. Exactly what verification is he talking about? The propaganda of the disciples of Christ? What independent evidence is there?
the Christian faith is unique in that it can account for the vast array of phenomena which we encounter in life things like the laws of science, the universal laws of logic, ethical norms, love, meaning in life, and, of course, the problem of evil.
No it can't. It attempts to explain phenomena using the logical fallacy of ignotum per ignotius: explaining the unknown by means of the more unknown. It is frequently demonstrated to be lacking and illogical in its explanations of things like "the problem of evil" and "ethical norms". It provides comforting but entirely unprovable delusions in its approach to questions such as the "meaning of life". The good qualities claimed to be Christian such as love and kindness are neither inventions of Christianity nor are they exclusive to Christianity. They are human qualities, not Christian ones. In all of its history, Christianity (or any other religion you care to name) has failed to solve any of the problems of mankind.
Expatbrit
oh my god, you guys!
some jehovahs witnesses just came to my house--and of course my latest strategy is to hide and let someone else answer the door, or not answer the door at all.
well, my younger brother is home from his first semester at college and he just happened to be near the door when they came knocking... .
LOLOLOL!!!!
Course I can just see the JW urban legend now:
"........and the really amazing thing is that the magazines wouldn't burn!!!!!"
Expatbrit
i was just thinking.
since christmas is about the birth of christ, i know dec 25 was not his birthday, probly born around late sept or early oct. i guess he wanted to be born right before the baseball playoffs and world series, just kidding.
it was the early christian church that appointed dec 25th.
That is when the church did Christmas the intention was to remove all the pagan worship and its meaning, and its meaning is the key. Just because they had some of the pagan toys of the winter solstice does not mean they used them for the intention of pagan celebration.
So, despite the Christians adopting a pagan religious day with its trappings, it is meaning that is the key.
So, what's good for the Christians should be good for everyone else. If atheists engage in Christmas, it is meaning that is the key. Just because they have some of the Christian toys of Christmas does not mean they use them for the intention of Christian celebration.
If you remove the Christian worship and its meaning from Christmas, your participation has no relevance to Christianity.
Or is there yet another double standard to be applied here?
Expatbrit
ok. i admit i'm clueless, but i haven't been involved with the jws for years.
and i've not heard here what that new light is supposed to be.
i've been very busy living a jw-free life and enjoying it very much.. could someone please tell me exactly what the lastest flip flop on the 1914 generation is?.
Which basically means: the people who are alive when Armageddon comes will be the people who are alive when Armageddon comes.
Pretty good prophecy, what?
Expatbrit
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
Friday you positively scintillate this evening! Such dropsical alliteration. Such commodean illustrations!
By Jaracz I think you should write Watchtower articles. You have the right stuff to write the rite stuff.
And now I believe I shall effluviate myself off to bed.
Expatbrit
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
I'm thinking about kicking you off the list and flushing you down the toilet along with TR. Now don't tell me that you find that "acceptable too".
I find it tolerable.
Expatbrit
i've taken note that the person that goes by the name "outlaw" continues to post daily.
yet, he hasn't entered the thread whose title bears his very own name.
yes, conveniently, outlaw skips past a thread that calls him to account for the lie he spoke about yadirf.
On top is acceptable too.
Expatbrit