DA:
I know the point of the illustration. It's not the first time I've heard it.
You spew the regular religionist spiel: "here's what the important things in your life should be. Oh, you don't agree! Then what do you have to offer?"
Why the hell should I offer anything? Who appointed me to that position? Or you? Or anyone? What qualifies you? Where's your certificate with God's signature?
My reply to your post was entirely impersonal. You chose to take it as a personal attack. I did not "damn you". Nor am I obligated to give replacement guidance or direction to that which you offer. I wish to let people decide for themselves what the most important things in their lives are, not heap rocks on them. It is up to you to decide what is best for your own life.
I suspect the kind of people who would be drawn to the viewpoints given in reply to your post, are people who wish to be able to think and decide for themselves, not be dictated to or coerced with "what better stuff do you have to offer us, then" reasoning.
This is not a kingdom hall. We will not all sit and nod dreamily at falacious illustrations. Given the tone of your reply, that's the truth that is hurting, here.
If there is a God up there, then please save me from those who think they know what is best for me!
Expatbrit