Without a doubt, I've been spoiled.
I should in Boston around Sept.28,29.
Posts by golf2
-
40
I Still Like JWD. Do You???
by minimus ini really enjoy the posters here.
it's a bit calmer but it still works for me!
-
golf2
-
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Fellows, I'm referring to professors, engineers a architects on this subject and yet you refuse to check them out, why? Here's another professor speaking out, and it's 50 pages in length if you care to read it. Http://review.com/articles/griffin/nyc1.html Really, am I asking toooooooo much?
If you guys can't be objective about this issue, how can you be objective about other issues? I have provided many sites for everyone to view, what have you guys provided? Is this a one-sided affair? As former witnesses, did you not have material to refute householders, well, where's your refutation? What I'm beginning to see is that nobody wants to at least say, I may be wrong, instead, you give me government funded agencies who naturally support government claims. I've taken abusive and belittling comments about my occupation from people who have NO about my trade!!!! I've been blessed and honored with the people that I have worked with throughout my years.
For anyone to say to me that they will not look at videos or rely on experts who say that the wtc was rigged, and yet, accepts NIST and Fema's report, just doesn't make sense. Check out these agencies, it may surprise you. While your at it, check out FIAT money and The Federal Reserve that has deceived people since 1913!!!!! I guess that's all bullshit too!!
Please supply me information (videos,etc) from independent sources that say, the wtc collapse came about by the plane crash and the subsequent fire. Is that tooooo much to ask? -
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Beta-male, I'm also a tree surgeon, meaning, I know how to knock things down. What's your experience? You didn't get my drift about the additional columns. Here I go again, the inner core columns were MUCH thicker than the perimeter columns. Are you trying to convince me that 47 inner columns uniformly and simultaneously collapsed together not to mention the hundreds and hundreds of other columns below where the plane crashed? I guess citing the additional columns of 240 didn't leave any lasting impression about this immense structured building that collapsed. What experience do YOU have in this field? Are you a demolition expert? Provided me with some videos to view your argument, is that asking too much?
Caedes, what crap you are spewing out, the Nist's report? Is that your best? A government funded group, yeah right.
You haven't checked out http://physics911.net/stevenjones As I've said Caedes, you are calling these top notch Engineers and Architects at http://patriotsquestion911.com/engineers.html arse's. So, your telling me that your in a better position than these Engineers and Architects to know HOW the WTC came crashing down!!!! You remind me of a scripture in the Bible that says,"For if anyone thinks he is something when he is nothing, he is deceiving his own mind." Galations 6:3 You not acknowledging the contents of above sites speaks volumes. Your still saving face. -
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
Caedes. I have repeatedly said that the inner core columns amounted to 47. The thickness of these core columns differed than the outside perimeter columns amounting to 240. So, if the inner core columns being thicker than the outer perimeter columns, then the perimeter columns should have collapsed first, but it didn't. The tower stationed on the building came straight down, how's that? What does that tell you? You need to review the collapse of the buildings, especially the tower coming straight down.
It is obvious to me that your just saving face! I will allow time to takes it course. In the meantime, why not view this video. http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/407.html
You never gave any credence to the site I suggested you view, and once more, http://patriotquestion911.com/engineers.html I guess these Engineers and Architects are speaking from their arse's! How about the other one, http://www.ae911truth.org/
This topic is down my alley. Keep discrediting me, its wood in the fire for me. -
30
Breaking: Mother is going back to the Watchtower
by What-A-Coincidence ineven though she knows it's hypocritical.
she felt 'loved' there.
she misses that.
-
golf2
My mom is 94 and stills attend meetings. When she really needed help, no one was there for her. She goes to the meetings only for Jah.
-
76
Re: My 9/11 threads ... a study in NLP ... enjoy!
by What-A-Coincidence inhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nohk8qk-ajw.
.
-
golf2
http://physics911.net/stevenjones
So, jet fuel was able to burn 287 steel columns uniformly and simultaneously where the plane crashed? -
15
Making You Feel Guilty Is What The Watchtower Does Best!
by minimus inthey beat people up with false "encouragment" to do more.
one could never ever fulfill the organization's demands.
it is impossible.
-
golf2
Your 100% on the money. They are NEVER satisfied, never!
-
47
Gin is best drunk with?
by stillajwexelder ingin is best drunk with
1)ice only
2)tonic and lemon slice
-
golf2
Tangueray & tonic with lime!!!!!
-
93
News from downunder - the mystery of the falling tower on 9/11
by ozziepost inappearing in our news today is this item which may, or may not, lay the conspiracy theories to bed.
us investigators solve 9/11 mysteryaugust 22, 2008, 8:32 am.
ap [enlarge photo]us investigators say they have solved the mystery of the collapse of world trade centre building seven in the september 11 attacks.. the 47 storey trapezoid sat north of the world trade centre towers, across vesey street in new york city's lower manhattan.. on september 11, it was set on fire by falling debris from the burning towers, but sceptics have long argued that fire and debris alone should not have brought down such a big steel and concrete structure.. scientists with the national institute of standards and technology say their three year investigation of the collapse determined the demise of wtc seven was actually the first time in the world a fire caused the total failure of a skyscraper.. "the reason for the collapse of world trade centre seven is no longer a mystery," said dr shyam sunder, the lead investigator on the team.. investigators also concluded that the collapse of the nearby towers broke the city water main, leaving the sprinkler system in the bottom half of the building without water.. the building has been the subject of a wide range of conspiracy theories for the last seven years, partly because the collapse occurred about seven hours after the twin towers came down.
-
golf2
The Federal Reserve plot has been going on since 1913!!!!!! Why do you guys fail to check out the Federal Reserve?
Let me say this, if you ever saw the hugeness steel we handle with cranes, you'll probably go in your pants! I remember an ironworker who worked on the Prudential building in Boston say how frightful the size of the columns were. This is an ironworker. The Prudential buildings steel columns were nothing compared to the WTC columns.
Try convincing 85% my community members who are ironworkers about the WTC. -
8
Proof that everything you see on youtube is the absolute truth.
by JeffT inreally.
.
http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=qqlzx7eyiwu.
-
golf2
Big Tex, the following is not from YOUTUBE to prove the 911 government conspiracy; http://patriotquestions911.com/engineers.html also http://physics911.net/stevenjones
In my opinion, your trying to save face. All your stating is what government officials want you to believe. Trying to convince me that 47 columns all caved in uniformly by jet fuel, not to mention the bottom floors, and the floors below, etc, is far fetched.