Washington, Jefferson, Franklin, Jackson, Lincoln ...
Does your state have an above-mentioned county?
Alabama has every one, except Lincoln.
Inspired by a sweet poster.
Sylvia
washington, jefferson, franklin, jackson, lincoln .... does your state have an above-mentioned county?.
alabama has every one, except lincoln.. inspired by a sweet poster.. sylvia.
good morning, all.. it is good to be here.. thanks to all for your contributions.. love and blessings.
sylvia.
pimo (physically in, mentally out)?
no.. pomi (physically out, mentally in)?
no.. pamo (physically & mentally out)?
good morning, all.. it is good to be here.. thanks to all for your contributions.. love and blessings.
sylvia.
pimo (physically in, mentally out)?
no.. pomi (physically out, mentally in)?
no.. pamo (physically & mentally out)?
pimo (physically in, mentally out)?
no.. pomi (physically out, mentally in)?
no.. pamo (physically & mentally out)?
http://www.orlando-times.com/the_journey_of_jalessa_526.html.
the orlando times.
home.
pimo (physically in, mentally out)?
no.. pomi (physically out, mentally in)?
no.. pamo (physically & mentally out)?
pimo (physically in, mentally out)?
no.. pomi (physically out, mentally in)?
no.. pamo (physically & mentally out)?
PIMO (physically in, mentally out)? No.
POMI (physically out, mentally in)? No.
PAMO (physically & mentally out)? Yes! Yes! Yes!
Of course mentally or out could come first, e.g., MIPO, MOPI, MAPO and OMIP, OPIM, OMAP/OPAM, or any other combination.
You kids are something else.
Tee hee hee.
Granny Sylvia
with respect to christ being the "redeemer" and of having "paid the ransom", i would like to know:.
(1) what is your technical understanding of each term?.
(2) what is the watchtower's understanding of each term?.
You may be on to something, Steel.
I believe the WT is on point in its understanding of redeem - the explanation of the go'el, or nearest relative who repurchased a person or his property if things went wrong, is very understandable.
However, it is my belief that WT is way off course on the ransom.
For example, the teaching that Jesus Christ is the archangel, Michael, sent to prove that a human can maintain integrity to the end, thereby upholding God's sovereignty is ludicrous.
How is it that an angel can be called our next of kin?
I realize WT tries to explain this by insisting that Michael/Jesus Christ is the first of God's creation, but I've always questioned that.
Sylvia