Hear we go again, me thinks I'm about to shoot myself in the foot again.
I keep coming closer and closer to exposing who I am IRL (by my own doing) because I care less and less about remaining anonymous as I feel my time is short and it is only a short time before I get DF/DA anyway.
For the sake of clearing some things up and because I'm almost at the point that I dont give a damn who knows my real identity, Im posting this brief synopsis about myself so you will understand why I believe what I believe to be true and what makes me more knowledgeable about this matter then most folks. Here is my background:
I authored the US Treasurys system administrators day-to-day computer security manual currently in use at the Bureau of Alcohol Tobacco and Firearms (ATF).
I have tested the security of the Department Of Justice massive data centers.
I have tested the security of numerous NASA related systems including those that control space craft.
Based on my findings, changes were made in many systems NASA wide also my findings have now become part of the official Congressional record.
I have created security and contingency plans for five NASA data centers.
I have worked undercover for the federal government and have been a member of no less then five top hacker groups, including one sponsored in part by the KGB.
I have had the FBIs head of covert operations sipping coffee in my living room and trying to recruit me to work undercover for his agency.
I have been an invited speaker of the Computer Security Institute.
I have been an invited speaker of the Surveillance Expo.
I have lectured at the largest and most important US intelligence agency, the National Security Agency.
That is my unique background / qualifications, which some Elders are familiar with and could expose me, so be it. Im hopeful that this disclosure adds weight to the views I will next express.
Now that everything is on the table, I say this:
Mr. Bowens site had a measurable level of security before a finite date; and the security level of that site has been reduced considerably after that date.
Who or what changed it from what it was?
Since I do not have ALL the facts I cant / wont say, further since I dont have ALL the facts and dont have the ability to read peoples hearts I cant / wont say if such changes were deliberate and malicious or sloppy / stupid and accidental, however there were a number of security holes introduced into the site that were not there before the aforementioned date.
And no Im not providing this date to anyone so dont ask.
If some posters assume that they are being accused by me, they are incorrect; I dont have enough data to publicly accuse anyone, and besides I dont do that, its not my style.
Unlike some others, I do have a technical background and education to know enough to know that I simply dont know enough to start pointing fingers Edited to add the words: (did I really just say that J ) . People who dont have enough familiarly with the technical issue of security are afraid of it and make statements that are better not said because they hurt and alienate people unnecessarily in the process.
Mr. Bowen's cause is one that I support.
I for one have the ability to separate and uncouple Mr. Bowen from the cause he represents, and I am generally an extremely tolerant person. However I hope I will not be foolish enough to abandon Mr. Bowen or his cause should I get caught up in all of this ill will that seems to be running rampant.
Despite his faults, Mr. Bowen is a genuinely good man, and yes that is my opinion but I believe this to be true, and even if I dont agree with the way Mr. Bowen has handled some issues or people, I still genuinely hold this man in high regard.
The cause is too important to allow the imperfections of one man or the hurt feelings of any person to stop it. I dont know how to fix the rift that has developed between some people and Mr. Bowen and I am saddened that it has developed and continues to grow even at this late date.
I just offer some information to help explain why I think some things are the way they are and hope that cooler heads on all sides of the issue will prevail.
And I know a good number of persons on this forum have abandoned anything even remotely Biblical, but for any that may find some wisdom in these words, here they are:
How often shall my brother sin against me and I forgive him? Up to seven times? No, forgive him up to seventy times seven.
Freeman
Edited by - freeman on 6 January 2003 12:47:1
Edited by - freeman on 6 January 2003 13:17:48
Edited by - freeman on 6 January 2003 13:23:23