Caedes, there is a problem with anti-gun laws. The problem is that when law-abiding citizens are banned from having guns - or any other weapon for that matter - then by default only criminals have weapons. This makes the law-abiding citizens targets. When law-abiding citizens are in posession of weapons, there is no additional threat. There is no additional criminal intent. The already law-abiding citizens just happen to have a weapon in his or her posession. Caedes, because you live in the UK, I assume you don't own a gun. But if you did, would you automatically go out in the street and start shooting people or robbing convenience stores? No, you wouldn't, and neither do any of the thousands of lawfully armed United States citizens who carry a gun. In fact, crime statistics in the US support the claim that crime of all types, but particularly armed robbery, are reduced when gun laws are more liberal. So, it is safer for everyone, including those who chose not to carry a weapon.
In a perfect world, we wouldn't need guns, but since there are people who have them that shouldn't, it makes it a necessity for the rest of us to have access to them.