AGuest: I understand presevervation of 2nd and 4th Amendment rights are important. I think preserving lives is more important, however, and if you lived in Oakland, you might agree....
Anyway, again, I understand the threat to 2nd and 4th Amendment rights. But if you lived in Oakland, you might think the safety of citizens might outweight those rights, right now.
It is truly baffling to me that people can say "I know your rights are important, BUT, HOWEVER....."
Huh? What's more important than freedom? Isn't freedom supposedly worth dying for? "Give me liberty or give me death"? Or, for those whose historical awareness comes entirely from Hollywood, Mel Gibson's Braveheart: "Freeeeedoooommmm!!!"
When we get to the point where we're saying, "We'll give up our rights to solve this one particular problem," we're now taking those rights for granted.
And tomorrow, when someone else wants to take away another one of our rights to solve some other problem, well, now there's precedent, isn't there?
Maybe we should just join the Watchtower again. After all, if we just follow their rules, we'll never overdose on drugs, never contract an STD, never lose all our money in Vegas, never join a gang. Of course, we'll have to give up some freedoms, like freedom of speech, the freedom to pursue a profitable career, the freedom to obtain secular education, and the freedom to use our lives according to our own will. But hey, our safety from those bad things "outweighs our rights," doesn't it?