The number of 144.000 has been reached at http://www.jehovahs-witness.com
Just a quick note. ;-)
The number of 144.000 has been reached at http://www.jehovahs-witness.com
Just a quick note. ;-)
please fill in more!.
mark leigh or paul gillies .
public affairs office for jehovah's witnesses .
I think none of the Spießbürger-Adresses is working. BTW, a "Spiessbuerger" is a German expression for a narrow-minded person.
But you have Wrobel, Johannes [email protected] who is head of the History Department.
This looks genuine.
So the others should be
[email protected] (Branch Committee)he is in his 80s I wonder if he really has eMail; Pohl is a commom name in Germany so maybe his adress is not that simple)
[email protected] (an old Gilead-Missionary, Branch-Committee)
[email protected] (President of German Branch)
[email protected] (PAD)
[email protected] (PAD)
Richard Krispens is a manufacturer for bags and leatherwraps
[email protected]
Fritz Poppenberg is not a JW but a moviemaker who has made movies about JW in the Third Reich and GDR [email protected]
Gabriele Yonan is a scientist (I think Sociology) who supports minorities incl. JW and Scientology
[email protected]
And Hans Wurst is a German idiom for a silly person, which literally is: John Sausage...
please fill in more!.
mark leigh or paul gillies .
public affairs office for jehovah's witnesses .
Kontaktadresse:
Jehovas Zeugen
Abteilung für Öffentlichkeitsarbeit
Alice Klar, Telefon: (0190) 144 000
E-Mail: [email protected]Willi K. Pohl [email protected]
Richard Kelsey [email protected]
Raymon Templeton [email protected]
Bernd Klar [email protected]
Uwe Langhals [email protected]
Johannes Wrobel [email protected]
James N. Pellechia [email protected]
Dr.Detlef Garbe [email protected]
Gabriele Yonan [email protected]
Fritz Poppenberg [email protected]
Richard Krispens [email protected]
Hans Wurst [email protected]
Kent, you have become victim of satire (which infact is the topic of http://spiessburger.purespace.de from where you got these adresses. While some eMails seem to be valid, some are nonsense. There first six seem to be okay (from Willi Pohl to Uwe Langhals). I don't think that Pellechia has a German account @de.wtbts.org.
BTW, the adress of the German Public Affairs Desk is [email protected].
yes, i know, the title is a pun.
it was deliberate.. i can recall in the 1970s seeing very few overweight jws.
in fact, i used to think (in my arrogant jw manner) that this was a sign of how jws were better at self-control than worldly people.
One thing may be that you cannot associate in sport clubs and that you are always told that sports are not very beneficial.
And since field service hours are declining...
hi, hawkaw.
i have a question for you.
in all your discussions with the uns ngo chief, was there any talk about membership fees or dues required from ngos?
It depends on the charter. I was told that the German Branch don't give any humanitarian aid because for some reason I don't know they would have to help anyone regardless of their religion. So, they could not say: we send this to JW in this country and maybe a few JW neighbors.
Humanitarian aid is usually given privatly. In the seldom instances the WTS organizes something in Europe I know that the French branch is responsible.
one thing i've noticed about these witness admissions of and justifications for the society's 10-year association with the un is that in many cases, the speakers sound as if they have known about the situation for a while.. otherwise, how can they justifiably come across as so cocksure if they've only learned about it now?.
"of course we need to be registered with them for promoting human rights and the preaching work!
it's just like being a legal corporation.
Here you are:
"But why is this union of religion and the UN so dangerous? Because "the ten horns . . . and the wild beast, these will hate the harlot and will make her devastated and naked . . . and will completely burn her with fire." (Revelation 17 Verse 16) False religion is therefore headed straight for a catastrophic collision with politics. Being denuded and her rank uncleanness revealed, she will be destroyed utterly." (w85 8/1 p. 7)
one thing i've noticed about these witness admissions of and justifications for the society's 10-year association with the un is that in many cases, the speakers sound as if they have known about the situation for a while.. otherwise, how can they justifiably come across as so cocksure if they've only learned about it now?.
"of course we need to be registered with them for promoting human rights and the preaching work!
it's just like being a legal corporation.
I guess they will claim to have stopped the association to avoid stumbling anyone. They saw the "campaign" of the apostated and wanted to shelter the brothers who could be confused by a "false" presentation of the facts.
is there a new breed of jw emerging, i wonder?.
i know that there are lots of real brainwashed dubs around who see demons behind every car boot sale item and who scuttle off to the elders with every bit of tittle-tattle imaginable, but, i think that there is a new type of dub who quietly does just as he / she pleases.. this is what i think: many of the long-serving jw's who have seen the 1975 failure and the 1914 generation change are now approaching old age with something of a jaundiced eye, and are choosing to do their own thing in their remaining years.
in conversations i am picking up it seems that the elders are being regarded somewhat derisively by many jw's.
There are hardly any newcomers from the outside. So the new JW are JWs children. I observe that the children of hardliners are either hardliners themselves (but on a lower level) or they leave because of the pressure.
Children of JW that are only JW for social reasons are the ones you describe. They either leave or never get baptizes or they copy their parents stance.
But the WTS is getting more maintream. They see that the end does not come and now they are looking for their place in human society. Show must go on. That's why they look for recognition from governments, UNO and others.
I think the one's with problems to cope with this are the hardliners. Those who just stay for social reasons don't really care.
So, the conflict between hardliners and reformers keeps on. But I think some hardliners could become XJW because the Society is getting too liberal to them.
how to fix the organization.. just like the iran-contra scandal!
blame it on the dead guy!.
this is a perfect opportunity to come clean and reform the.
It's ironic that the one who refused to "compromise" neutrality by allowing civil service was the one who signed the association with the UN...
If I remember correctly (I lend CoC to my father and he gave it to a friend :-)) Barry said he withdrew because of a typo in the quoted Scriptures. I think he just realized there was going to be a change because of the two third majority. I withdrew his vote, there was still a majority but it was not enough to get a change. In 1996 there were new GB members and some former ones were dead (or DFed!) so that Barry's view did not matter - if he did not change his opinion.
Maybe he read CoC. ;-)
daniel 11:40a reads "and in the time of [the] end the king of the south will engage with him in a pushing".
the german nw used to read "einen zusammensto" ("a pushing") until the revision in 1986. then it was changed to "zusammenstoe" ("pushings").
i notice the 1987 french edition reads "des heurts" ("pushings") like the german one.. the english nw reads unchanged "a pushing".
Daniel 11:40a reads
"And in the time of [the] end the king of the south will engage with him in a pushing"
The German NW used to read "einen Zusammenstoß" ("a pushing") until the revision in 1986. Then it was changed to "Zusammenstöße" ("pushings"). I notice the 1987 French Edition reads "des heurts" ("pushings") like the German one.
The English NW reads unchanged "a pushing". Remember that the English NW is the Original and the foreign editions are just translations of the English NW.
I think they wanted it to fit more the explanation that there are many "pushings" and not only one big one.
For example, the text at the picture on page 279 in the book "Daniel's Prophecy" reads:
"Pushing" by the king of the south has included high-tech espionage and the threat of military action
This view that there are several pushings was hold before 1986, even in the 60s. Maybe this was not considered when the NW was being achieved in the 50s.
They can do this change because the Hebrew text just uses "to push".
But it is interesting that it seems to be changed only in the foreign editions while the English original stays unchanged.