Just for fun, I did a search for "waiting on Jehovah" on the internet. One of the top hits is from a discussion forum under the topic "Pushing ahead." Here are a few of the questions and comments that interested me.
Ginny
From http://www.geocities.com/meskojay/Forum67/000040.html
Discussion dated 23 June 2000.
Furmom:The thought that some are "pushing ahead" was brought out on another thread. I had an interesting conversation with someone from my hall about what exactly this is. So I thought I'd ask here and get some viewpoints.
1. What do you consider "pushing ahead"?
2. How do you know when someone is not "waiting on Jehovah"?
3. Do you consider is not "waiting on Jehovah" if you know that someone was df'd wrongly and try to right this wrong?
andyman4:1) Pushing or moving ahead can be good. A person has to be diplomatic and have a worthwhile suggestion though.
2) Not waiting on Jehovah-Someone who tries to change a doctrinal matter. Or keeps insisting a suggetion they made be implemented.
3) If a person has concrete evidence that a df'ing shouldn't have happened they can appeal. The df'd person shouldn't be afraid to inform the police if someone has committed a crime against her. An example can be a sister who has been raped.
Furmom:I don't know, I always remember the widow that kept coming before one of the judges (maybe Solomon?) to get justice from her adversary at law. She got justice because she bugged him so much.
I sometimes think a little outspoken-ness would go a long way in the congregation. A lot less abuse of power will go on if injustices became common knowledge.
Kaleen:I think the difference is attitude.
Pushing ahead and pushy - could be a thin line.
The widow, we can assume, was at all times respectful, she humbly WAITED but she was persistant. She did not give up.
However, had she nagged or raised a large crowd of supporters what reaction would she have recieve. It does not say that she had a crowd at her back but that she alone went and petitioned.
Food for thought
shelby:you are right about the widow, furmom, but she was petitioning the judge about her *own* case...i am simply wondering about the impropriety of becoming involved in a case that really isn't our own...and why the one who may be wronged can't seem to work up the passion you have for justice...
Starlite:Kaleen, I agree with you. Your illustration makes a great deal of sense.
We are given the right to make our concerns known. If, in fact, there has been a injustice or oversight and we have brought it to the attention of the brothers invovlved in a respectful manner, the rest is up to them. If they fail to correct matters or investigate, perhaps form their own conclusions with a biased viewpoint, they will be held accountable.
That takes patience and faith on our part, there's no doubt about it.
Isn't it true that we can also be pushing ahead if we try to force on others speculations about Jehovah's plans for the future?
Or, let's say we complain that somethings are not done fast enough or that change is not happening when we feel it should be.
Could it be that Jehovah allows matters to take their course in a way that appears "slow" to us for a reason?
Just a few thoughts...