Silly Trinitarians love this garbage. Stupid enough to take the Bible literally and even stupider for believing something as pathetically absurd as the 'holy' trinity.
Stupid is as stupid believes.
i usually open posts such as this one with disclaimer for the atheists/agnostics out there.
i respect your position and what i tried to do in posts like this one is discuss the bible, wether you believe the stories or not.. i believe it is well known that in jw doctrine it is thought that no one has ever seen god.
this teaching is also supplemented by the accounts of moises, where jehovah told him that no one can see him and yet live to tell the tale.. i, however, was always puzzled by some of the grammar in the bible where it seems to imply that god appeared to people.
Silly Trinitarians love this garbage. Stupid enough to take the Bible literally and even stupider for believing something as pathetically absurd as the 'holy' trinity.
Stupid is as stupid believes.
yes or no.......what say you?.
i'll start - no!.
.
If he shows, he'll just say he is only one out of the whole GB and has no individual power.
He won't lie or deny the policy, but will say they "cannot go beyond what is written " (yes, blame Jehovah).
Remember, the legal system is not interested in debating correct scriptural interpretation on this anymore than it is on the JWs blood transfusion policy.
He will say that JWs must obey all laws that are not in direct conflict with God's law, and if the law in Australia changes to require mandatory reporting by elders to the secular authorities, the elders will be instructed to comply with that.
It's not possible to reason with brainwashed religious fanatics who hold primitive mythology to be immutable truth.
The onus is on the civilised and enlightened world and it's legal system to intervene to stop the evil fruitage religious fanatics produce.
what question would you ask geoffrey jackson, as a member of the governing body of jehovah's witnesses, to answer?
.
jw leaks.
why won't they (the wbt$ head honchos), simply change policy on sex offenders?
will they?..especially after the arc for eg?
it seems that with all the bad press and now the arc among other institutions that are exposing the wbt$ for a haven for paedophiles, why hasn't the wbt$ simply changed it's insane policy?.
Because they're brainwashed, ignorant, religious nutters, who honestly believe their God requires 2 witnesses to child rape.
They're about on the same level as the most brainwashed, deluded, pig-ignorant, fundamentalist Muslim.
I'd rather die at Armageddon than worship such a deity.
so i was fooled by the witnesses.
what can i learn from that?
not to accept things at face value but to seek out opinion and different view points.. hence my question " do you believe man landed on the moon?.
historic investigation of jws latest videos are on youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dtxakzq0ity&feature=youtu.be.
Yep, the Watchtower Society puts the blame at Jehovahs feet. It's Jehovah who requires witnesses to child rape. The elders are only following "divine law".
It's like watching the religious equivalent of the Nuremburg trials.
are you pleased with the exposure of the society in australia?
do you feel personally vindicated by it?
do you think it gives you credibility with others now that all the things you said were going on, actually are documented?
Nitty Gritty is a troll. The same info was posted on another thread by a different user name.
Barbara Anderson's website has a link to an excellent article on www.jwsrefined.com which offers a full scriptural refutation of the Society's pharasaical two witness rule as applied to child abuse allegations. http://jwsrefined.com/category/articles/
what can i add?
this says it all.. elder on stand is mute till prompted.. .
i guess i could encourage you to watch to the end and a guest commentary, lol..
what can i add?
this says it all.. elder on stand is mute till prompted.. .
i guess i could encourage you to watch to the end and a guest commentary, lol..