SO MANY EXCELLENT suggestions and comments and ideas to think about! All you folks have GREAT BRAINS!!!
You know the saying, 'Know your enemy..." It sure pays to have the backup and brains of all these former JWs who many have been thru the same thing. (I USED TO believe the GB were innocent and naive, like that scripture at Luke 16:8 they would use to convince us. However, I no longer believe that).
If the lawyers are running the show and this hearing, how could they write such stupid things in the letter (i.e., no witnesses, no lawyers, no tape recording, etc.). Like a few of you have posted, you yourselves were told by attorneys that, yes, no matter what the JC says, attorneys CAN be present. Surely the WTS attorneys would know that, and so why would THEY make such a statement in the letter to Bill?
Could it be that, as I have also heard in the past, that the WTS itself is disengaging itself from the local congregations re: DF'ings and the like, in order to keep the WTS itself from being liable in any way? Therefore, maybe this letter WAS written by the local brothers, and that may account for their stupidity in the letter-??? (just a thought). Because...
Their letter said, "In accordance with the USUAL procedure..." How can they even tell Bill NO WITNESSES when, thanks to Focus who posted the pertinent portions, the "usual procedure" as outlined in the elder book plainly states you CAN have witnesses? It would seem to me that that statement right there in their letter would VOID the entire process.
That remark about respecting the elder chairing the committee... that's about the most sorry thing I'd ever heard, as if grown men need to even say such things to each other. (Sounds like they are expecting some HEATED discussion.)
Re: Not telling you the Charges in advance. I don't see how they can get away with that either.
Dungbeetle (I think) mentioned Bill "cannot get a fair hearing" in his local congregation - that was a good point. Does the WTS/JC make room for Change of Venue options?
The letter also said, "no tape recordings will be allowed at the hearing." It said TAPE recordings, but it said NOTHING ABOUT A COURT REPORTER. (She types on a little machine with PAPER in it, not tape). You should hire a bona fide court reporter to sit in on the proceedings. She is not there as a witness and she is not there as an observer. She is there merely for the purpose of taking down the proceedings.
Also, if the whole DF'ing issue is a soon-to-be (if not already) "slander" issue (Bowen v. WTBTS of NY & PA), then I would think it is ALREADY in the "legal playing-field," and Bill's attorney most likely has these bases covered, his attorney will be present, and they will take a court reporter, etc. It wouldn't surprise me if his attorney already filed suit against the WTBTS & Bill's cong for harrassment and/or slander, etc. on or before the day Bill received the letter from the JC.
This issue reminds me of something my former boss/attorney did: Granted, it was not a religious issue, but just about as "heavy" re: MEDICAL doctors (who all think they are GOD, too, btw): Our clients would be summoned by the respective insurance companies (who we were suing for injuries/damages) to attend IME's (Independent Medical Examinations) by doctors who were then PAID by these insurance companies for performing these so-called "IMPARTIAL" independent medical examinations. (Yeah, right!). My former boss/attorney created a HUGE STINK in this town when he began insisting that COURT REPORTERS be PRESENT in the examining room while the doctor performed the IME on our client. Well, the doctors in town FOUGHT THIS tooth and nail, refusing to allow the court reporters into the examination rooms, even when the patient/client and court reporter had shown up all ready to go. But the doctors would then refuse to perform the examination at all. It was really a HUGE STINK that went on for months and months, but the boss never waivered, and took them all to court about this issue of whether the client/patient has a right to have a court reporter present for these IME's, and he won, and the docs had to give in to the patient's (and the boss') request for a court reporter to be present. --- Ahhhh, those were the days! :-)
Back to Bill's Hearing: It's a crying shame it even has to come to this. It really is. I would be so pleased if the WTS would just come clean, hand over the records to all the congregations and the legal authorities so all the friends and the public would know about the pedophiles. And if our so-called HUMBLE "slave class" would openly apologize to the Lambs, wouldn't that just warm everyone's heart? (I know I know... dreaming here). But, no, it looks like they have dug in their heels and spurs, and there's no turning back.
Therefore, get out your six-shooters and holsters, boys, and FORWARD HO! to the Show-down at High Noon.
Best Wishes & Much Success on whatever strategy you choose, Bill!
GRITS