I believe that burden of proof is only on the theist if they are trying to convince you that what you believe is wrong. If the theist doesn't really care if believe something different then there is no need for proof. That being said, if you were asked why you don't believe in the Bible and drew a blank don't feel bad. I believe you were probably overwhelmed with the ton of ways you could prove the Bible incorrect and you didn't know where to start.
It's interesting that no one has been able to 'prove' the bible wrong. In fact, it took science years to catch up with the bible. Until 1492, everyone thought the earth was flat. Isaiah said, in 600 BC, that the earth is a circle. He was right!
Wrong! The Earth is a sphere not a circle and they did know what a sphere was at that time period. In fact Science was held back because to the bible. Most gains in medical and mathmatic knowledge during that time period came from muslim nations. I don't know what happened to them they were the most intelligent people on earth at one time.
This, coupled with fulfilled prophecy, archeological and historical evidence proves that the bible was not written by men, but by God Almighty. The question is, Do you want to believe it?What fulfilled prophecy? Archeological and scientific evidence has proved most of the Bible wrong. There is no evidence of the Bible being written by god; did you pull that one out of your ass? In fact at the rate of discovery the ILLIAD will be more accurate than the Bible and that is a fictional story (just like the Bible).
Edited by - gsx1138 on 2 February 2003 23:5:55