Wow folks! tooooooooooooooooo much!
Alan...you are the master dude!
In all seriousness, you are taking me backwards....which is good.
Your diligence has moved at least one guy, to re-think what could be a wrong conclusion.
I have a commentary called THE NEW INTERNATION DICTIONARY OF THEOLOGY.
R. Franz quoted from it quite a bit in a personal letter to me. Much of what this commentary said on the subject of the Trinity, I AM, the Soul, etc. was contrary to orthodox beliefs.
I assumed at the time, that since this commentary differed a bit from others views, perhaps the writer was a liberal radical, not to be trusted, or was one of the few that hold to opinions of less popularity on these subjects.
The big problem is this, (for me that is), if you are correct.......How does God view the millions who view Jesus as God?
Why would he allow his identity to be so obscure.
Would it be proper to attend churches that insist on these teachings for salvation, as to the dubs, with their similar reasoning.
This may bring some back to the conclusion..."there must be a group who teaches the truth on these matters"
I would NEVER become that brain-dead to think that way again, on a matter such as this.(that salvation answers, are in the hands of some group)
As for your comments on HOW the NT writings BECAME as part of the bible cannon is good news for me.
I have never yet had an explanation as to WHO decided WHO'S writings/letters, were to be part of the bible.
It would seem one would have had to be appointed by God himself, or to by someone who God had talked to, telling that person the writers letters were approved.
All scripture is inspired of God....the question....who DECIDED they were scripture.
Perhaps this is the reason the Catholics claim to be the oracles of God since the Holy Writings were entrusted to them....(as they see it)
Alan, I respect your honest observations.
All others have helped also,
Moxy ,I enjoyed your thoughts on progression and feel MUCH of that is true...product of environment
Dakota, much of what you said and quoted has to be looked at from the Trinitarian view point of Jesus 'full-man/ full-God theory to see why he spoke of himself in a subjective sense.
Taking all things said by Jesus and his followers at face value, will get you in a brain rat nest.
No...I'm not losing my religion....just having the guts to be open to.... "WHAT IS TRUTH"?
Thanks to all who are putting their best thoughts into this..........it's a big question!