Yardif,
You, and everyone else who comes to this discussion board, will fully realise that there is no way in which I or anyone else could obtain access to the private mail of a congregation Elder. You, and everyone else, will also know that nobody with a grain of intelligence would post information which gave names, places, times and dates on a forum like this. I must therefore admit that your ploy has been entirely successful.
This leaves me very disappointed because I originally invited you to obtain information from the Society and the UN yourself so that you could not claim that it was false. If the information provided to me through the local congregation was in fact false, you could have then demonstrated this to me and made me look as foolish as those who provided the information to me in the first place. Apostates would also have been stopped in their tracks if you could have proven that the information that they were bandying about was a pack of lies.
The thing that disappoints me most however is that you have the necessary skill, all of the resources, and the perfect opportunity to completely vindicate the reputation of the Organisation that you represent, if this were possible. The fact that you have chosen not to do so provides myself and others who read your contribution with the obvious conclusion that vindication of the name of the Organisation to which you claim to belong is not possible.
link
edited by link for grammar.
Edited by - link on 9 December 2002 7:13:20
Edited by - link on 9 December 2002 7:42:47