On page 2 of this thread, MrFreeze made a short but very interesting point which nobody followed up in detail and I am very curious to learn more about it and hear people's views...........
......."Well where did sin come into play if you don't look at it literally? Did god create us perfect? If not, why would we need Jesus' sacrifice? "
(NB I am not a regular poster and probably unknown to most, so I will just mention for background information, that I have never been a JW or been connected to the religion. Although in my teens I was a nominal 'Christian', I never read the bible much or thought about theology and once I started using rationality rather than emotion on which to base beliefs, the supernatural was soon dismissed. But I am now fascinated by religion (in an academic, not faith based way), and this topic in particular is something I have been pondering recently. I come here as I find it a great place to learn, as I find the average exJW, whatever their current beliefs, knows more about the bible than even vicars, priests and church ministers that I have met).
So back to the topic.
For the last 150 years, science has progressively been pushing religion into a position of defensiveness to the point that now most Christians (at least in Europe, not sure about the US?) believe that Adam, Eve and the snake were allegorical, and they accept evolution as the way God created Man.
I have posed the following genuine question to a couple of Christians in my acquaintance:
......"At what point in the evolution of the human species do you believe 'sin' originated, bearing in mind that evolution shows that we humans are a part of the animal kingdom and early hominids evolved from ape like creatures?"
One just looked puzzled and said she didn't know but would have to think about it, another said it could have been when the human conscience developed. However, on further questioning, he can't bring himself to believe that before that, these conscience-less humanoids were 'perfect'. It is too far a stretch for him to envision a particular time after which every baby was born in sin and therefore prone to death, although the baby's parents were 'perfect' but lacking a conscience. He didn't think there was a gene for 'sin' that suddenly appeared in the human genome and then became heritable from parents.
I read the 'Neanderthal' idea on this thread but that doesn't work well either.
There seems to be a conundrum, and no-one has yet been able to give me an answer. So I would like to know from you guys if there is a credible explanation that fits with Christian teachings?
Leading on from that, if there was no actual time when mankind fell from perfection, how does the Christian message of salvation work? Why did Jesus need to come to die in such a gory, horrific way to save us all from sin, if God created us the way we are through evolution and we didn't rebel?
Correct me if I have understood this wrongly, but from what I have learned, it all seems to work nicely if you believe in a literal Adam. Adam was originally perfect but chose to sin and was then, together with all his descendants, condemned to die. But Adam's death could not atone for sin because God's justice demanded a perfect man to give his blood and Adam was no longer perfect. So Jesus was sent instead. This makes a sort of sense in a fairytale kind of way.
But if Adam is not literal, how does it work? I just don't get it, and nor do the Christians I have asked so far, but they are not very well versed in their theology either so I hoped that exJW Christians here might be able to give a plausible explanation? As I said, I am here to learn.