A very prominent elder here in Scotland - watch out for him at Perth this year, folks - said that there is no sin greater than renouncing your faith. He said that to go from being a Jehovah's Witness to not being one is a sin worse than adultery.
OK, a couple of things;
- Jehovah's Witness - manmade religious name concocted by Rutherford, a man who preached as gospel that the 'ancient worthies' would be resurrected and back on the earth by 1925. A self-confessed false prophet
- Just because a person no longer wishes to be a Jehovah's Witness does not mean that they have renounced their faith. Sorry, correction; it does mean that they've relinquished their faith if said faith is in a manmade publishing corporation based in Brooklyn NY.
- ex-JWs are considered as having "run ahead of the the teachings of the Christ". 2 John 9 is righteously cited as the scripture which backs this assertion up. However, what is the "teaching of the Christ"? Very simply that Christ came in the flesh, died and was resurrected (v7). So if a Jehovah's Witness chooses to reject that Christ returned invisibly in 1914 and chose the WTS in 1919 they are not leaving any teaching of Christ. Christ taught that it doesn't belong to men on earth to have knowledge of his return. Therefore, using 2 John 9 is a complete twisting of scripture to suit the purpose of Jehovah's Witness, said purpose being to excommunicate and shun ex-JWs, to hate ex-JWs