possible makes this claim;
Don't kidding!
You made a fool of me.
Okie dokie.
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
possible makes this claim;
Don't kidding!
You made a fool of me.
Okie dokie.
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
possible -
"simply an observation"?
I feel "don't kidding."That guy making a fool of "long necks."
Take it up with the moderators. Simon?
this study will set the tone for future-proofing the watchtower society doctrine that their governing body is "the faithful slave" mentioned in parable by jesus in matthew24.. i thought as i read the study article starting on p.20 that the most important thing about this piece is what is missing, what is not said.. the first paragraph sets the tone of what they are trying to convey.. "while giving the composite sign of the last days jesus said, who really is the faithful and discreet slave?".
i believe what they are doing with the opening paragraph is placing the authority and position of "the slave" within the context of the signs of the times thus attempting to validate it.
without mentioning when they became such.. they then say that jesus would "reward" and appoint this slave over all his belongings.
mindsfree....hmmm, it has a certain ring of familiarity to it.
I think it would work.
We'd obviously need someone of great writing skill to populate the site with insightful and discerning articles that cut to the heart of false WTS doctrine.
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
possible said;
Mr. passwordprotected.
I think that you have been brainwashed with what is probably different.
That is, the incorrect Trinity doctrine (Jesus is Jehovah), the fundamentalism more than JW, etc.Well, those persons' "long necks" is not a part which we should blame.
That criticism itself is unpleasant.Can your avatar criticize others?
possible
I'm under attack! I'm under attack! Quick, moderators, defend me!
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
So Christ will be on earth?
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
In what way? (I threw out 2 song books yesterday).
(bookmark this 'cause if the gb uses it, #1 we will know they watch this site; #2 you heard it here first...
lol!).
their dilemma: as we know, the gb is between a rock and a hard place right now.
I actually quite like this. May I use it for when I start my own religion?
this study will set the tone for future-proofing the watchtower society doctrine that their governing body is "the faithful slave" mentioned in parable by jesus in matthew24.. i thought as i read the study article starting on p.20 that the most important thing about this piece is what is missing, what is not said.. the first paragraph sets the tone of what they are trying to convey.. "while giving the composite sign of the last days jesus said, who really is the faithful and discreet slave?".
i believe what they are doing with the opening paragraph is placing the authority and position of "the slave" within the context of the signs of the times thus attempting to validate it.
without mentioning when they became such.. they then say that jesus would "reward" and appoint this slave over all his belongings.
Have you read the proper blog on this article on Death or obedience btw.?
Matt.
Sorry, I don't visit apostate websites.
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
Very obviously, the pics are not real, they are just being photographed! (of course), but I get the idea of what you are talking about!
You know what I'm saying, they look like they're being brain-washed. Sadly, that photo is exactly how they expect the R&F to sit during the meetings.
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
Those dudes have incredibly long necks. But we won't hold that against them.
What exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.
I mean, srsssly. Scary.