Posts by lostsheep82

145

FUN TEST! I am 37% JW!! Post your percentage here plz

by Tired of the Hypocrisy in

jw
friends

i found this online.

i have not seen it on here before so i thought i would post it.

it is a test to determine if you belong in the jw religion.

lostsheep82

I'm 33 percent. Aparently it's ok to dictate who your friends are and we can't make our own judgements on people.

19

The righteous will posess the earth

by lostsheep82 in

everytime i talk to my mom about the religion i once was a part of, she always throws scriptures at me.

even though i provided her and my 'anointed' step dad with an 85 page letter of research on this religion, provided quotes of all failed prophecies, and all the bs the society feeds them, personal emails from the un and letters from the society in their stupid defence....they just took it as apostate material.

my step dad even admitted he didn't read the whole thing, but he got the 'just' of my point.

lostsheep82

I like that point. What magazine is that from? Watchtower July, 1946???

19

The righteous will posess the earth

by lostsheep82 in

everytime i talk to my mom about the religion i once was a part of, she always throws scriptures at me.

even though i provided her and my 'anointed' step dad with an 85 page letter of research on this religion, provided quotes of all failed prophecies, and all the bs the society feeds them, personal emails from the un and letters from the society in their stupid defence....they just took it as apostate material.

my step dad even admitted he didn't read the whole thing, but he got the 'just' of my point.

lostsheep82

Everytime I talk to my mom about the religion I once was a part of, she always throws scriptures at me. Even though I provided her and my 'anointed' step dad with an 85 page letter of research on this religion, provided quotes of all failed prophecies, and all the BS the society feeds them, personal emails from the UN and letters from the Society in their stupid defence....they just took it as apostate material. My step dad even admitted he didn't read the whole thing, but he got the 'just' of my point. Whatever.

Anyways one thing I talked to my mom about was the fact that no where in the bible does it mention paradise earth. Her defense was the scripture that says " The righteous themselves will posess the earth, and they will reside forever upon it".

I grew up in the 'truth' and was 'spiritually strong', and I can usually defend myself on this side just as good as I defended the truth when I was in it, but this scripture makes me wonder and think and makes me confused a little....

No the bible doesn't mention paradise earth, but what does this scripture mean then?

Thoughts?

4

I need some verification.

by hubert in

i dont think anything has changed.

i have the 2007 rom and this is what it says:.

questionsfromreaders.

lostsheep82

I dont think anything has changed. I have the 2007 rom and this is what it says:

W67 11/15 pp.702-704 "Questions from readers".

Questions

FromReaders

?

IsthereanyScripturalobjectiontodonatingone’sbodyforuseinmedicalresearchortoacceptingorgansfortransplantfromsuchasource?—W.L.,U.S.A.

A number of issues are involved in this matter, including the propriety of organ transplants and autopsies. Quite often human emotion is the only factor considered when individuals decide these matters. It would be good, though, for Christians to consider the Scriptural principles that apply, and then make decisions in harmony with these principles so as to be pleasing to Jehovah.—Acts 24:16.

First, it would be well to have in mind that organ transplant operations, such as are now being performed in an attempt to repair the body or extend a life-span, were not the custom thousands of years ago, so we cannot expect to find legislation in the Bible on transplanting human organs. Yet, this does not mean that we have no indication of God’s view of such matters.

When Jehovah for the first time allowed humans to eat animal flesh, he explained matters this way to Noah: "A fear of you and a terror of you will continue upon every living creature of the earth and upon every flying creature of the heavens, upon everything that goes moving on the ground, and upon all the fishes of the sea. Into your hand they are now given. Every moving animal that is alive may serve as food for you. As in the case of green vegetation, I do give it all to you. Only flesh with its soul—its blood—you must not eat." (Gen. 9:2-4) That allowance was made to Noah, from whom every person now alive descended. Hence, it applies to all of us.

Humans were allowed by God to eat animal flesh and to sustain their human lives by taking the lives of animals, though they were not permitted to eat blood. Did this include eating human flesh, sustaining one’s life by means of the body or part of the body of another human, alive or dead? No! That would be cannibalism, a practice abhorrent to all civilized people. Jehovah clearly made a distinction between the lives of animals and the lives of humans, mankind being created in God’s image, with his qualities. (Gen. 1:27) This distinction is evident in His next words. God proceeded to show that man’s life is sacred and is not to be taken at will, as may be done with the animals to be used for food. To show disrespect for the sanctity of human life would make one liable to have his own life taken.—Gen. 9:5, 6.

When there is a diseased or defective organ, the usual way health is restored is by taking in nutrients. The body uses the food eaten to repair or heal the organ, gradually replacing the cells. When men of science conclude that this normal process will no longer work and they suggest removing the organ and replacing it directly with an organ from another human, this is simply a shortcut. Those who submit to such operations are thus living off the flesh of another human. That is cannibalistic. However, in allowing man to eat animal flesh Jehovah God did not grant permission for humans to try to perpetuate their lives by cannibalistically taking into their bodies human flesh, whether chewed or in the form of whole organs or body parts taken from others.

It is of interest to note that in its discussion of cannibalism the EncyclopœdiaofReligionandEthics, edited by James Hastings, Volume 3, page 199, has a section designated "Medical cannibalism." It points out that this is associated with the idea of obtaining strength or some medical virtue from the flesh of another human, adding: "The most remarkable example of this practice occurs in China. Among the poor it is not uncommon for a member of the family to cut a piece of flesh from arm or leg, which is cooked and then given to a sick relative. . . . The whole superstition in China is certainly connected with the idea that the eating of the human body strengthens the eater. . . . Among savages the practice is found of giving a sick man some blood to drink drawn from the veins of a relative." Some might argue that therapeutic practices involved in modern organ transplant operations are more scientific than such primitive treatment. Nonetheless, it is evident that men practicing medicine have not been beyond using treatments that amount to cannibalism if such have been thought justified.

Modern science has developed many different types of operations that involve human body parts, some common and usually successful and others experimental and often unsuccessful. It is not our place to decide whether such operations are advisable or warranted from a scientific or medical standpoint. It would be well, though, for Christians faced with a decision in this regard to consider the indication as to God’s viewpoint presented in the Scriptures.—Eph. 5:10.

At present scientific researchers are starting to use artificial or animal parts where formerly human parts were thought necessary, such as in the case of cornea transplants. (See, for instance, ScienceNews for May 21, 1966, page 396, and Time for April 28, 1967, pages 68 and 70.) Whether wider use of such operations will be made, we do not know. Nor can we decide whether a Christian should accept some animal part as a transplant; that is for personal decision. (Gal. 6:5) However, we can be sure that in the future the time will come when all human medical operations will be unnecessary. (Rev. 21:4) Christians have strong evidence that the new order is near at hand when Jehovah the Great Physician will, through Jesus, do healing beyond the limitations of medical science of today.—Mark 8:22-25; John 11:43, 44; Acts 3:6, 7; Matt. 12:15.

What should be done, though, when a Christian is asked to provide an organ for use in another person or to allow the body part of a deceased loved one to be so used? We might ask, If a Christian decided personally that he would not sustain his own life with the flesh of another imperfect human, could he conscientiously allow part of his flesh to be used in that way to sustain someone else?

Even from a medical standpoint there is some question as to the wisdom and ethicalness of some transplants. One physician discussed this publicly in the AnnalsofInternalMedicine, citing the results of 244 kidney-transplant operations. In the majority of cases the recipient did not live more than a year after the operation. Then, commenting on the dangers for the volunteer who donates one of his kidneys, the doctor asked: "Is it right to subject a healthy person . . . to the possibility . . . of shortening his life by 25 or 30 years in order to extend another’s life by 25 or 30 months or less?" Reporting on this, Newsweek, of March 2, 1964, page 74, added that the doctor "offers no conclusive answer, but he suggests that the question needs to be asked more often."

When it comes to deciding what to do with one’s own body or with the body of a deceased loved one, for which a Christian is responsible, the apostle Paul’s words at Romans 12:1 should not be overlooked: "I entreat you by the compassions of God, brothers, to present your bodies a sacrifice living, holy, acceptable to God, a sacred service with your power of reason." Baptized Christians have dedicated their lives, bodies included, to do the will of Jehovah their Creator. In view of this, can such a person donate his body or part of it for unrestricted use by doctors or others? Does a human have a God-given right to dedicate his body organs to scientific experimentation? Is it proper for him to allow such to be done with the body of a loved one? These are questions worthy of serious consideration.

Not to be overlooked is the use to which a dead body might be put. Would a Christian who, while living, refused to give his blood to be used as a transfusion for some other person, allow his body to be turned over to a group or to a person and possibly at that time have the blood removed and used for transfusion, as has been done with some cadavers? (See, for example, Awake! of October 22, 1962, page 30.) A person might feel that he could stipulate that his body not be used in that way; but if many persons in authority refuse to abide by a Christian’s wishes about blood when he is alive, what reason is there to believe they will show more respect for his wishes after his death? Would they use his organs in cannibalistic medical experiments?

Our bodies are the creation of Jehovah God. (Ps. 100:3; 95:6; Job 10:8) Christians might allow apparently necessary surgery to be performed, such as to remove a diseased limb, but they do not needlessly mutilate their bodies created by Jehovah. Would allowing a body to be mutilated after death be showing respect for and appreciation of God’s creation? True, in some instances there may be legal requirements that Christians abide by, such as when the law requires a postmortem examination to determine the cause of death. (Rom. 13:1, 7; Mark 12:17) In such cases the next of kin can usually request that the organs not be removed for transplant or reuse. In this way, even though an autopsy might be required, the Christian can prevent misuse of the body of a loved one. But when such laws do not apply, the Christian can decide in such a way as to avoid unnecessary mutilation and any possible misuse of the body. Thus he will be able to have a clear conscience before God.—1 Pet. 3:16.

It should be evident from this discussion that Christians who have been enlightened by God’s Word do not need to make these decisions simply on the basis of personal whim or emotion. They can consider the divine principles recorded in the Scriptures and use these in making personal decisions as they look to God for direction, trusting him and putting their confidence in the future that he has in store for those who love him.—Prov. 3:5, 6; Ps. 119:105.

?

HowcouldAsahelbelistedasadivisionalcommanderinDavid’sarmy(1 Chron.27:7)when,accordingto2 Samuel2:23,AsahelwaskilledevenbeforeDavidbecamekingoverallIsrael?—R.F.,U.S.A.

At 1 Chronicles 27:7 Asahel is listed as a divisional commander of the month-by-month arrangement of troops: "The fourth for the fourth month was Asahel, Joab’s brother, and Zebadiah his son after him, and in his division there were twenty-four thousand." The text at 2 Samuel 2:23 shows that following the test struggle at the pool of Gibeon and the subsequent rout of the Israelite forces under Abner, Asahel doggedly pursued the fleeing Abner and was finally killed by Abner when he refused to desist from the pursuit. (2 Sam. 2:12-28) Since Asahel died before David’s becoming king over all Israel, his mention here is believed by some commentators to prove that the arrangement here mentioned was to some extent made before all the tribes came to David in Hebron to acknowledge him as King. In this regard TheInterpreter’sDictionaryoftheBible (Vol. 1, page 244) says: "It is possible that we may have here the prototype of the Davidic militia organized earlier in the Judean rule of the king, and that his original list has been brought up to date by the inclusion of Zebadiah, son and successor of Asahel in his command."—Compare 1 Chronicles chapter 12.

Another suggestion arises out of the fact that at 1 Chronicles 27:7, the fourth division’s commander is said to be not only Asahel but "Zebadiah his son after him." This position of commander for a month was a privilege held by a distinguished veteran, and in some cases such honor may have been posthumous. Hence, the name "Asahel" here may have reference to his house, represented in his son Zebadiah, who is referred to as Asahel’s successor.

W80 3/15 p.31 "Questions from readers".

Questions

FromReaders

?

ShouldcongregationactionbetakenifabaptizedChristianacceptsahumanorgantransplant,suchasofacorneaorakidney?

Regarding the transplantation of human tissue or bone from one human to another, this is a matter for conscientious decision by each one of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Some Christians might feel that taking into their bodies any tissue or body part from another human is cannibalistic. They might hold that the transplanted human material is intended to become part of the recipient’s body to keep him alive and functioning. They might not see it as fundamentally different from consuming flesh through the mouth. Such feelings may arise from considering that God did not make specific provision for man to eat the flesh of his fellowman when he made provision for humans to eat the flesh of animals that had been drained of their life-sustaining blood. They may give consideration also to the way people in Bible times viewed sustaining themselves by taking in human flesh. For example, see the account at 2 Kings 6:24-30; Deuteronomy 28:53-57; Lamentations 2:20 and 4:10. At John 6:48-66, Jesus spoke figuratively of eating his flesh and drinking his blood. On hearing this discussion and not perceiving the spiritual significance of his words, some of his Jewish disciples were shocked and turned from following him. These accounts illustrate how some humans felt about eating human flesh.

Other sincere Christians today may feel that the Bible does not definitely rule out medical transplants of human organs. They may reason that in some cases the human material is not expected to become a permanent part of the recipient’s body. Body cells are said to be replaced about every seven years, and this would be true of any human body parts that would be transplanted. It may be argued, too, that organ transplants are different from cannibalism since the "donor" is not killed to supply food. In some cases persons nearing death actually have willed body parts to be used for transplants. Of course, if a transplant should require taking in another person’s blood, undeniably that would be contrary to God’s command.—Acts 15:19, 20.

Clearly, personal views and conscientious feelings vary on this issue of transplantation. It is well known that the use of human materials for human consumption varies all the way from minor items, such as hormones and corneas, to major organs, such as kidneys and hearts. While the Bible specifically forbids consuming blood, there is no Biblical command pointedly forbidding the taking in of other human tissue. For this reason, each individual faced with making a decision on this matter should carefully and prayerfully weigh matters and then decide conscientiously what he or she could or could not do before God. It is a matter for personal decision. (Gal. 6:5) The congregation judicial committee would not take disciplinary action if someone accepted an organ transplant.

6

Economic Crisis? Don´t panic, read this, enjoy, relax and watch....

by RedPill2006 in

lately my family is hammering on this economic crisis....it really pisses me off, that witnesses use anything negative that comes along and throw it in your face to make this logical conclusion: economic_crisis=end_near=work_your_ass_off_for_the_wt....then after a while nothing happens, everybody goes mphff...shuts up....goes quietly along until the next crappy news hit the wire.

this is such a sickening reasoning....it is like a cat trying to biting its own tail => useless!

since i ve started my fading, i have been really studying, real books (economics and history, i have been spoon feed with the societies view on history and have to re-read stuff with another point of view).

lostsheep82

http://www.zeitgeistmovie.com/

RedPhil, you might be interested in this movie. It's long but you can watch it online. It is a MUST WATCH for all. I loved it and I'm going to watch it again.....

24

My family wants me to see a Psychiatrist

by BonaFide in

so i have posted on here about my conversations with my family.

i toned it down a little when they got really upset, so many on this board told me to be careful.

but yesterday my sister called me.

lostsheep82

I have to sympathize with you. A few months ago my mom said the same thing, this is when I started pointing out the mistakes and inconsitencies of the society. She only says that they are imperfect and make mistakes.My answer is if it is GOD's org, we wouldn't have mistakes. She urged me to see a psychiatrist and get help casue my thinking is not normal. I'm not normal. Then I asked her if she loved me unconditionally. She said yes. I said, well when you could have been DF'd I would have NEVER stopped talking to you or ever shunned you or made you feel as low as you make me feel.

It is THEM that are trapped. We all here, know what it is like to think the way they do. Please know that you are perfectly fine, and we are ALL here to support you. This is a loooooooong road, especially if you've been in da truf for a long time.

You will get there, and hopefully one day you will find peace. Keep up with this board, it is much encouragement, and truly the only thing that has helped me come to the realization that the 'truth' isn't the truth after all. It is just another man made religion.

Ask your sister what the definition of 'man made religion' is. She'll describe every OTHER religion. Then ask her WHO started the JW's. IT WAS A MAN. thus man made. My mom had no answer. You have to figure out things that will make THEM think, rather then them sitting at home trying to figure out ways to make YOU think. My mom at that point will hand the phone to my 'anointed' step father, because he can answer me better.

Please feel free to PM me, as I know what you are going through as most of us on here do. After JWD closes, I will be a personal support if needed. I know some on here have helped me SOOO much. I only found things out since May. I'm so much stronger now due to this site.

Hang in there kiddo. You are just fine. The loss of family and love kill inside. We would never do that to them, however if we were still in, and blind...who knows. I use to shun my friends. Can't beleive I was so cruel. They say it's love.

IT'S HATE.

My thoughts are with you,

Lost sheep

9