Probably, to tell you the truth, it is not arguing about the Trinity itself.
I blame "that attitude of not allowing the other belief/doctrine."
why is it that ex jdubs always export what the witchtower says about the trinity and argue against that.. anybody who has read the trinity brochure must know how it distorts the quotes, often turning them right around.
the wt thinks the trinity means a three headed god, or makes up other such nonsense.. instead of attacking those whose faith leads them to believe in a triune godhead, maybe these people should find out what the real teaching on the trinity is rather than tub thumping against what the wtbts claims these christians believe.. whatever your opinion, all that really matters is that a christian calls on the name of jesus and looks to him for salvation.
it is the wt that claims you have to have every doctrine in line with their views or you will die.
Probably, to tell you the truth, it is not arguing about the Trinity itself.
I blame "that attitude of not allowing the other belief/doctrine."
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Is it a mechanical problem?
Or do you like dots?
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Thank you, Mr. OUTLAW.
Well, if possible, please do not write "........" (dots)
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Mr. Chalam.
Yeah,
I know.
You are a person who understands humor/black humor.
Please teach me English.
This is not joke.
I want to talk with you fluently in English.
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
Possible-san, troll elsewhere
LMAO.
You taught me the English word "bullsh*t."
Thx.
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
WOW.
People whom I do not respect have gathered in the thread here!
Chalam,
Shall I also point out your error each time?
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
Is it the topic about your avatar?
.
i was wondering does anyone still put links to the jw only watchtowers in pdf.. .
Hi, Ms. yknot.
Excuse me.
Please do not provide the people here unconditionally with the materials obtained from my website/forum.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/beliefs/175232/3/Elimination-of-Jesus-from-Song-Book
Probably, I think that you may understand my feeling.
possible
ive recently been looking at a non-jw tract this was an interesting paragraph.
watchtower 1st 1954 page 31. there we read "jehovahs witnesses are proud of the fact that they have eliminated from their song books, songs praising jesus (revelation, its grand climax at hand, page 36)".
i was in the org.
Mr. middleman.
Although I have not blamed you until now, you blamed me repeatedly and have made a fool of me.
Please do not get materials from my website/forum.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/174937/1/JW-only-Watchtowers-in-pdf-anyone-still-do-them
possible
those dudes have incredibly long necks.
but we won't hold that against them.. .
what exactly is the little dude getting out of the meeting.. i mean, srsssly.
Mr. passwordprotected.
The person to whom you should talk is not Moderators.
You are not apologizing to me at all.