Posts by possible-san

34

A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, by BRUCE M. METZGER

by possible-san in

a textual commentary on the greek new testament, by bruce m. metzger.

chm file (e book), 1.25mb.

http://anonym-to.com/?http://rapidshare.com/files/100421737/textual_commentary-greek_new_testament.rar.

possible-san

debator.

You clearly did not read my reply.

Isn't that you?

Furthermore, you have not received my advice seriously.

Yes Myelaine was pointing out Jesus was God's son on earth but she was implying that this changes when he goes to heaven.

I see.

Well, as for it, she answered to the question of Terry. (She did not answer to you then.)
He has made reference about Jesus prayed to the Father.
And with his first question, especially he has said "in the garden of Gethsemane."
Therefore, her answer was fitted to that. (I think)

And I think that Mr. Terry questioned especially to the Trinitarian.
Therefore, she answered to that question as a Trinitarian.
You do not need to accuse against that answer.
Your manner of speaking is only impolite to her.

possible

P.S.
I do/can not speak English basically.
However, I think that I may probably understand the thing which they want to say, better than you.

34

A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, by BRUCE M. METZGER

by possible-san in

a textual commentary on the greek new testament, by bruce m. metzger.

chm file (e book), 1.25mb.

http://anonym-to.com/?http://rapidshare.com/files/100421737/textual_commentary-greek_new_testament.rar.

possible-san

debator.

I think that you have neither "introspection" nor an attitude you "ask for instruction" to others.
In other words, that means you as "haughty" (you are not modest).

All I was doing was pointing out an obvious error in Mylene's answer this is not a ministry place but a debate forum where correct information is the point. I do not need to get into bed with trinitarians on here (or indeed at any time).

What is an "obvious error" in what Ms. myelaine said?
First of all, can't you write even her name (myelaine) correctly?

She/myelaine said like this.

2. again as a human on earth Jesus relied on the power of His heavenly Father for His entire ministry...subjecting Himself to the will of His Father.

What is an "obvious error"?
She has not said an "obvious error."

Her explanation has a "common feature" with your belief.
She has distinguished between "Jesus" and the "Father."
And she says, "subjecting Himself."

Before you attack her, you should hear her opinion carefully.

possible

34

A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, by BRUCE M. METZGER

by possible-san in

a textual commentary on the greek new testament, by bruce m. metzger.

chm file (e book), 1.25mb.

http://anonym-to.com/?http://rapidshare.com/files/100421737/textual_commentary-greek_new_testament.rar.

possible-san

Terry.
sabastious.
myelaine.
debator.

Thank you for commenting in this thread.

debator.

I do not have hate which other people may feel to you.
But, I think that you need to study more.

I do not believe the Trinity like you.
I am not a fundamentalist first of all.

But, I do not attack the Trinity like you.
For my own faith/belief, there is no requisiteness of attacking the Trinity.
At this point, I think that your faith/belief is "morbid/unhealthy", IMO.

Well, with regard to the Trinity doctrine, people have various viewpoints.
But, I had explained once in this forum on the basis of the doctrine of the main churches in Japan.
According to that doctrine, Jesus is not Jehovah.Or even if the name of the Trinity God is Jehovah/Yahweh, they teach that "the Father" is different from "the Son."And that is the "Trinity."

Probably, the Watch Tower society did not tell you such a Trinity theory.
Therefore, I think that people would express your explanation as a "straw man." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

First, I think that you should stop attacking people's belief.
And, you should learn that listening to the opinions of people, and understanding them correctly.
After you understand correctly, it is OK that you criticize their belief.

I hope your improvement in this point.

possible

34

A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament, by BRUCE M. METZGER

by possible-san in

a textual commentary on the greek new testament, by bruce m. metzger.

chm file (e book), 1.25mb.

http://anonym-to.com/?http://rapidshare.com/files/100421737/textual_commentary-greek_new_testament.rar.

possible-san

PSacramento.
debator.
isaacaustin.

Thank you for commenting.

debator.

The contradiction is simply too great and it isn't only the witnesses that drop the "me"

John 16:23 (New International Version)
23 In that day you will no longer ask me anything. I tell you the truth, my Father will give you whatever you ask in my name.to keep the "me" makes Jesus a liar.

If you probably commented somewhat early, I think that probably I can have explained to you a few more.
With regard to John 14:14, I was talking on September 23.
http://www.jehovahs-witness.net/watchtower/bible/199306/1/PDF-The-New-Testament-in-the-Original-Greek-1882-by-Westcott-and-Hort

Well, in order for us to discuss that subject, we need to have the knowledge of the special field of study of the so-called "Textual Criticism" to some extent.
(For instance, "The Alexandrian text-type", "The Western text-type", "The Byzantine text-type", etc.)

If you do not know that knowledge, you should not criticize by your ignorance.

And, I think it meaningless that you quote from the "NIV" mechanically here.
John 14:14 in the "NIV" includes "me."

John 14:14 (New International Version)

14 You may ask me for anything in my name, and I will do it.

http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=john+14:14&version=NIV;

Furthermore, the Watch Tower society printed the Greek word "me" without the bracket in the Greek text (KIT).
The matter which I took up is that point.
If your explanation is true, doesn't the Watch Tower society make Jesus a liar?

You should be careful in your speech.

possible

25