Scholar:
The secular date of 586 or 587 in its own way confirms the validity of a scripturally reckoned date of 607. I make this somewhat surprising statement because there are some scholars who regard the chronology in the old testament as symbolic or mythical.
I find it funny that people who consider the Bible to be the word of God and historically correct would make such a statement as you have. From what I can see, a simple reading of Daniel backs up the 586/587 recollection. If the OT chronology indeed is 'mythical', then exactly how much of the text can truly be considered accurate? Where is it's authority as the word of God?
It amuses me to see the society discounting scripture when it does NOT go along with their chronology. I just feel sorry for you falling for erred logic.
-ianao